Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs
| dc.citation.epage | 126 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 123 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Amornthewaphat, N. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hancock, Joe D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Behnke, Keith C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McKinney, Leland J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Starkey, C.W. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, D.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jones, C.L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, J.S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dean, D.W. | |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | jhancock | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | kbfeed | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | lelandm | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-02-18T20:24:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-02-18T20:24:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-02-18T20:24:34Z | |
| dc.date.published | 2000 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Pigs fed from wet/dry shelf-feeders had 6.8% greater ADG compared to those fed from dry shelf-feeders and used 18.3% less water than those fed from conventional feeders. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 16, 2000 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/2634 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Swine day, 2000 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 01-138-S | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 858 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Swine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Feeder design | en_US |
| dc.subject | Wet/Dry feeder | en_US |
| dc.subject | Finishing pigs | en_US |
| dc.title | Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
