Effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigs
Date
2010-02-18T20:24:34Z
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
Abstract
Pigs fed from wet/dry shelf-feeders had 6.8% greater ADG compared to those fed from dry shelf-feeders and used 18.3% less water than those fed from conventional feeders.
Description
Keywords
Swine, Feeder design, Wet/Dry feeder, Finishing pigs
