Evaluation of Ralgro® on pasture and subsequent feedlot performance and carcass merit of mexican crossbred steers

dc.citation.epage28en_US
dc.citation.spage26en_US
dc.contributor.authorPaisley, S.I.
dc.contributor.authorKuhl, Gerry L.
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, James J.
dc.contributor.authorHuck, G.L.
dc.contributor.authorFarran, T.B.
dc.contributor.authorSindt, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Sean P.
dc.contributor.authorBirkelo, C.
dc.contributor.authorBlasi, Dale A.
dc.contributor.authorDikeman, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authorHolder, Michael S.
dc.contributor.authorKehler, David E.
dc.contributor.authoreiddblasien_US
dc.contributor.authoreidmdikemanen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjhigginsen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidmholderen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddkehleren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-06T21:07:21Z
dc.date.available2010-08-06T21:07:21Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-06T21:07:21Z
dc.date.published2001en_US
dc.description.abstractA pasture/feedlot field study was conducted to evaluate the effects of a single Ralgro® implant during the stocker phase on steer grazing performance and subsequent feedlot performance and carcass merit. A total of 2,764 steers of Mexican origin averaging 449 lb were assembled in Texas and shipped to Kansas, where they grazed on three intensively-early-stocked Flint Hills pastures. At initial processing, the steers were individually weighed and randomly assigned to either a non-implanted control group or a Ralgro implant group. Ralgro steers gained more (23 lb; P<0.01) than controls during the 82- to 93-day grazing phase. Following the grazing phase, all steers were shipped to a commercial feedlot in southwestern Kansas where steers from each pasture were individually weighed and given a single Component E-S® implant. Immediately after processing, steers from each pasture were sorted into either a light- or heavy-weight pen, regardless of pasture implant treatment, resulting in six feedlot pens. Days on feed ranged from 127 to 197. Control steers gained faster (P<0.01) during the feedlot phase; however, Ralgro steers had higher cumulative weight gains across the combined pasture and feedlot phases (P<0.01) and averaged three fewer days on feed (P<0.05). There were no significant differences for marbling, fat thickness, ribeye area, KPH fat, or yield grade. Ralgro steers had lower (P<0.05) quality grades because of a higher incidence (P<0.001) of steers with B and C carcass maturities.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2001, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 2, 2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4556
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 2001en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 01-318-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 873en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectGrowth implanten_US
dc.subjectRalgroen_US
dc.subjectSteersen_US
dc.subjectPastureen_US
dc.subjectFeedloten_US
dc.subjectCarcass traitsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Ralgro® on pasture and subsequent feedlot performance and carcass merit of mexican crossbred steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle01pg26-28.pdf
Size:
27.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: