Conventional vs accelerated beef production for traditional and later-maturing cattle types

dc.citation.epage57en_US
dc.citation.spage55en_US
dc.contributor.authorMyers, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorDikeman, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Jack G.
dc.contributor.authoreidmdikemanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-18T18:04:07Z
dc.date.available2011-02-18T18:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-18
dc.date.published1979en_US
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of traditional and later-maturing cattle types fed under accelerated (placed directly on the finishing ration) and conventional (back grounded on a growing ration before finishing) system, indicated large differences between feeding systems but smaller differences between cattle types in the same feeding system. Differences between feeding systems stress the economic importance of maintaining maximum gain, and the disadvantages of extended feeding periods, when much of the feed consumed is required for maintenance. Later-maturing cattle on accelerated feeding required the least feed per pound of gain.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1979, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 2, 1979en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7409
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1979en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 350en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectFeeding systemsen_US
dc.subjectGainen_US
dc.titleConventional vs accelerated beef production for traditional and later-maturing cattle typesen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle79pg55-57.pdf
Size:
373.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: