Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Suliman, Ahmad
dc.contributor.author Carlson, Charles
dc.contributor.author Ade, Carl J.
dc.contributor.author Warren, Steve
dc.contributor.author Thompson, David E.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-24T21:20:41Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-24T21:20:41Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/39781
dc.description Citation: Suliman, A., Carlson, C., Ade, C. J., Warren, S., & Thompson, D. E. (2019). Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods. IEEE Access, 7, 53945–53955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.description.abstract A number of research groups have proposed methods for ballistocardiogram (BCG) peak detection toward the identification of individual cardiac cycles. However, objective comparisons of these proposed methods are lacking. This paper, therefore, conducts a systematic and objective performance evaluation and comparison of several of these approaches. Five peak-detection methods (three replicated from the literature and two adapted from code provided by the methods' authors) are compared using data from 30 volunteers. A basic cross-correlation approach was also included as a sixth method. Two high-performing methods were identified: the method proposed by Sadek et al. and the method proposed by Brüser et al. The first achieved the highest average peak-detection rate of 94%, the lowest average false alarm rate of 0.0552 false alarms per second, and a relatively small mean absolute error between the real and detected peaks: 0.0175 seconds. The second method achieved the lowest mean absolute error of 0.0088 seconds between the real and detected peaks, an average peak-detection success rate of 89%, and 0.0766 false alarms per second. All metrics are averaged across participants.
dc.relation.uri https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.rights © 2019 IEEE. This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.uri http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.rights.uri https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/pubs/oapa.pdf
dc.subject Ballistocardiogram
dc.subject Heartbeat
dc.subject Heartbeat Interval
dc.subject Heart Rate
dc.subject Heart Rate Variability
dc.subject Load Cells
dc.title Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods
dc.type Text
dc.date.published 2019
dc.citation.doi 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.citation.issn 2169-3536
dc.citation.jtitle IEEE Access
dc.citation.volume 7
dc.citation Suliman, A., Carlson, C., Ade, C. J., Warren, S., & Thompson, D. E. (2019). Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods. IEEE Access, 7, 53945–53955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.description.version Article: Version of Record (VoR)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019 IEEE. This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). Except where otherwise noted, the use of this item is bound by the following: © 2019 IEEE. This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

Search K-REx


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics








Center for the

Advancement of Digital

Scholarship

118 Hale Library

Manhattan KS 66506


(785) 532-7444

cads@k-state.edu