Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods

dc.citationSuliman, A., Carlson, C., Ade, C. J., Warren, S., & Thompson, D. E. (2019). Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods. IEEE Access, 7, 53945–53955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.citation.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.citation.issn2169-3536
dc.citation.jtitleIEEE Access
dc.citation.volume7
dc.contributor.authorSuliman, Ahmad
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Charles
dc.contributor.authorAde, Carl J.
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Steve
dc.contributor.authorThompson, David E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T21:20:41Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T21:20:41Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.published2019
dc.descriptionCitation: Suliman, A., Carlson, C., Ade, C. J., Warren, S., & Thompson, D. E. (2019). Performance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods. IEEE Access, 7, 53945–53955. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.description.abstractA number of research groups have proposed methods for ballistocardiogram (BCG) peak detection toward the identification of individual cardiac cycles. However, objective comparisons of these proposed methods are lacking. This paper, therefore, conducts a systematic and objective performance evaluation and comparison of several of these approaches. Five peak-detection methods (three replicated from the literature and two adapted from code provided by the methods' authors) are compared using data from 30 volunteers. A basic cross-correlation approach was also included as a sixth method. Two high-performing methods were identified: the method proposed by Sadek et al. and the method proposed by Brüser et al. The first achieved the highest average peak-detection rate of 94%, the lowest average false alarm rate of 0.0552 false alarms per second, and a relatively small mean absolute error between the real and detected peaks: 0.0175 seconds. The second method achieved the lowest mean absolute error of 0.0088 seconds between the real and detected peaks, an average peak-detection success rate of 89%, and 0.0766 false alarms per second. All metrics are averaged across participants.
dc.description.versionArticle: Version of Record (VoR)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/39781
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2912650
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.rights.urihttps://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/pubs/oapa.pdf
dc.subjectBallistocardiogram
dc.subjectHeartbeat
dc.subjectHeartbeat Interval
dc.subjectHeart Rate
dc.subjectHeart Rate Variability
dc.subjectLoad Cells
dc.titlePerformance Comparison for Ballistocardiogram Peak Detection Methods
dc.typeText

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
08695012.pdf
Size:
7.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
supplementalnotesfinal.pdf
Size:
105.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: