Kansas legislators prioritize obesity, but overlook nutrition and physical activity issues

dc.citation.doidoi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e318254cc57en_US
dc.citation.epage145en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Public Health Management & Practiceen_US
dc.citation.spage139en_US
dc.citation.volume19en_US
dc.contributor.authorHeinrich, Katie M.
dc.contributor.authorStephen, Mellina O.
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, Katherine B.
dc.contributor.authorKellogg, Melinda
dc.contributor.authoreidkmhphden_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-19T20:17:42Z
dc.date.available2013-06-19T20:17:42Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-19
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractState-level policymakers play an important role in the fight against obesity due to their ability to create policies that influence opportunities for physical activity and nutrition. Objective: In 2011, we investigated how Kansas policymakers regarded obesity, nutrition and physical activity in comparison to other issues. Design: This study used a cross-sectional design. Setting: This study was conducted in Kansas, a predominately rural and Republican Midwestern state. Participants: All 181 state-level policymakers in Kansas were mailed a cover letter and survey. Main Outcome Measures: Policymakers were asked to identify and rate the importance of issues or problems in need of attention for Kansas. The 2011 state legislative report was content analyzed and coded to match the survey. Comparisons were made by political party. Results: Of the 49 policymakers who completed a survey, 37 were Republicans and 43 were elected to their position. Although obesity was rated second highest behind jobs, physical activity and nutrition-related issues were not seen as important problems; as well, little corresponding legislation was introduced. Other key issues identified by policymakers included budget/spending/taxes, education, jobs/economy, and drug abuse, with more legislation reflecting these problems. Democrats ranked 11 issues as more significant problems than did Republicans: quality of public education, poverty, access to healthcare, lack of affordable housing, ethics in government, lack of public health training, access to healthy groceries, lack of pedestrian walkways/crosswalks/sidewalks, pedestrian safety, air pollution, and global warming (P < .05). Conclusions: There is a need to provide more public health education on the relationship between nutrition and physical activity issues and obesity for Kansas policymakers. Issues identified may be similar for other predominately rural and Republican states.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15919
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://journals.lww.com/jphmp/Abstract/2013/03000/Kansas_Legislators_Prioritize_Obesity_but_Overlook.6.aspxen_US
dc.rightsThis is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, 19(2), 139-145.en_US
dc.subjectPolicyen_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectNutrition policyen_US
dc.subjectMotor activityen_US
dc.titleKansas legislators prioritize obesity, but overlook nutrition and physical activity issuesen_US
dc.typeArticle (author version)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HeinrichJPubHealthManagPrac2013.pdf
Size:
143.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: