Implant comparisons for grazing yearling steers

dc.citation.epage13en_US
dc.citation.spage12en_US
dc.contributor.authorLaudert, S.
dc.contributor.authorCorah, L.
dc.contributor.authorNelson, R.
dc.contributor.authorSauerwein, C.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-10T17:41:24Z
dc.date.available2010-12-10T17:41:24Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-10
dc.date.published1985en_US
dc.description.abstractThree field trials were conducted with grazing yearling steers to compare Compudose® and Ralgro® implants. Compudose® and Ralgro® implants. Compudose®-implanted steers gained faster (P<.05) than controls. Ralgro® improved daily gain by 3.8%. No significant difference was found between implants.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1985, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, February, 1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6881
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1985en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 85-319-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 470en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectGrazingen_US
dc.subjectSteersen_US
dc.subjectImplantsen_US
dc.titleImplant comparisons for grazing yearling steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle85pg12-13.pdf
Size:
157.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: