Comparison of Ralgro® and Compudose® implants for suckling steer calves

dc.citation.epage105en_US
dc.citation.spage104en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimms, D.
dc.contributor.authorDinkel, A.
dc.contributor.authorJepsen, D.
dc.contributor.authorSchalles, R.
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-27T14:21:11Z
dc.date.available2011-01-27T14:21:11Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-27
dc.date.published1983en_US
dc.description.abstractTwo field trials were conducted to compare Ralgro and Compudose for suckling steer calves. Ralgro, Ralgro re-implanted, and Compudose increased gain over controls 2.5. 5.9, and 1.5%, respectively, with only the increase from Ralgro re-implanted being signficicant (P<.05). Ralgro reimplanted steers gained more than Compudose steers (P<.05).en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2003, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 4, 1983en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7101
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen's Day, 1983en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 427en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectImplantsen_US
dc.subjectSteersen_US
dc.titleComparison of Ralgro® and Compudose® implants for suckling steer calvesen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle83pg104-105.pdf
Size:
131.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: