Preventive and therapeutic efficacy of finasteride and dutasteride in TRAMP mice

dc.citation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0077738en_US
dc.citation.issue10en_US
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_US
dc.citation.spagee77738en_US
dc.citation.volume8en_US
dc.contributor.authorOpoku-Acheampong, Alexander B.
dc.contributor.authorUnis, Dave
dc.contributor.authorHenningson, Jamie N.
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Amanda P.
dc.contributor.authorLindshield, Brian L.
dc.contributor.authoreidheningsnen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidblindshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-15T22:08:19Z
dc.date.available2013-11-15T22:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-18
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The prostate cancer prevention trial (PCPT) and Reduction by dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial found that 5α-reductase (5αR) inhibitors finasteride and dutasteride respectively, decreased prostate cancer prevalence but also increased the incidence of high-grade tumors. 5αR2 is the main isoenzyme in normal prostate tissue; however, most prostate tumors have high 5αR1 and low 5αR2 expression. Because finasteride inhibits only 5αR2, we hypothesized that it would not be as efficacious in preventing prostate cancer development and/or progression in C57BL/6 TRAMP x FVB mice as dutasteride, which inhibits both 5αR1 and 5αR2. Method/Principal Findings: Six-week-old C57BL/6 TRAMP x FVB male mice were randomized to AIN93G control or pre- and post- finasteride and dutasteride diet (83.3 mg drug/kg diet) groups (n =30–33) that began at 6 and 12 weeks of age, respectively, and were terminated at 20 weeks of age. The pre- and post- finasteride and dutasteride groups were designed to test the preventive and therapeutic efficacy of the drugs, respectively. Final body weights, genitourinary tract weights, and genitourinary tract weights as percentage of body weights were significantly decreased in the Pre- and Post-dutasteride groups compared with the control. The Post-dutasteride group showed the greatest inhibition of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia progression and prostate cancer development. Surprisingly, the Post-dutasteride group showed improved outcomes compared with the Pre-dutasteride group, which had increased incidence of high-grade carcinoma as the most common and most severe lesions in a majority of prostate lobes. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found little benefit from the finasteride diets, and they increased the incidence of high-grade carcinoma. Conclusion: Our findings have commonalities with previously reported PCPT, REDUCE, and the Reduction by dutasteride of Clinical Progression Events in Expectant Management (REDEEM) trial results. Our results may support the therapeutic use of dutasteride, but not finasteride, for therapeutic or preventive use.en_US
dc.description.versionArticle: Version of Record
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/16810
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077738en_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectProstate cancer preventionen_US
dc.subjectDutasterideen_US
dc.subjectFinasterideen_US
dc.titlePreventive and therapeutic efficacy of finasteride and dutasteride in TRAMP miceen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LindshieldPlosOne2013.pdf
Size:
576.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: