Effects of delayed filling and H/M Inoculant® on preservation and quality of corn silage

dc.citation.epage70en_US
dc.citation.spage66en_US
dc.contributor.authorBolsen, K.
dc.contributor.authorHinds, M.
dc.contributor.authorIlg, H.
dc.contributor.authorHoover, J.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-10T17:45:14Z
dc.date.available2010-12-10T17:45:14Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-10
dc.date.published1985en_US
dc.description.abstractEight whole-plant corn silages were evaluated using laboratory silos. Treatments were: 1) control (no additive); 2) H/M Inoculant applied to the fresh crop at the forage harvester (H/M-field); and 3) H/M Inoculant applied to the fresh crop at the time of ensiling (H/M-silo). The control and H/M-field treatments were ensiled at 0, 4.5, and 12 hours post-harvest with the fresh crop remaining in the forage wagons until ensiled. The H/M-silo treatment had the inoculant applied immediately prior to ensiling at 4.5 and 12 hours post-harvest. All eight corn silages were well preserved and underwent predominantly lactic acid fermentations. H/M Inoculant did not influence lactic acid content or 1actic:acetic and lactic:DM loss ratios. However, H/M-field silage ensiled immediately showed small improvements in quality over the control silage, as judged by lactic acid content and the two fermentation efficiency ratios. H/M Inoculant did not effect DM recovery at any ensiling time. However, when averaged across inoculant treatment, silages made at 4.5 hours post-harvest had the highest DM recoveries; silages at 12 hours, the lowest. All 4.5 and 12 hour post-harvest silages had less lactic and total acids than those made at harvest. The silages made as soon as possible after harvest had a faster accumulation of lactic and total fermentation acids than the same fresh crop ensiled 12 hours post-harvest.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1985, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, February, 1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6897
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1985en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 85-319-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 470en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectPreservationen_US
dc.subjectCorn silageen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.titleEffects of delayed filling and H/M Inoculant® on preservation and quality of corn silageen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle85pg66-70.pdf
Size:
20.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: