Comparison of Revalor®-S and Synovex® Plus™ implants for heavyweight, short-fed, yearling steers

dc.citation.epage123en_US
dc.citation.spage122en_US
dc.contributor.authorKuhl, Gerry L.
dc.contributor.authorFlake, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorDrouillard, James S.
dc.contributor.authoreidjdrouillen_US
dc.date1999en
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-23T19:57:45Z
dc.date.available2010-08-23T19:57:45Z
dc.date.issued2010-08-23T19:57:45Z
dc.date.published1999en_US
dc.description.abstractOne hundred four Hereford × Angus steers averaging 897 lb were implanted with Revalor®- S or Synovex® Plus™ and fed a high concentrate diet for 82 days. Feed efficiencies and daily gains were not different between the two implant groups. Although most carcass characteristics were similar, Revalor-S tended (P<.09) to yield a higher percentage of carcasses that graded USDA Choice or better.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1999, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 5, 1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/4721
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1999en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 99-339-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 831en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectSteersen_US
dc.subjectFinishingen_US
dc.subjectRevalor-Sen_US
dc.subjectSynovex plusen_US
dc.titleComparison of Revalor®-S and Synovex® Plus™ implants for heavyweight, short-fed, yearling steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle99pg122-123.pdf
Size:
17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: