Why dispersal should be maximized at intermediate scales of heterogeneity

dc.citationSkelsey, P., . . . & Garret, K. (2013). Why dispersal should be maximized at intermediate scales of heterogeneity. Theoretical Ecology, 6(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-012-0171-3
dc.citation.doi10.1007/s12080-012-0171-3en_US
dc.citation.epage211en_US
dc.citation.issn1874-1738
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.jtitleTheoretical Ecologyen_US
dc.citation.spage203en_US
dc.citation.volume6en_US
dc.contributor.authorSkelsey, Peter
dc.contributor.authorWith, Kimberly A.
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, Karen A.
dc.contributor.authoreidkwithen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidkgarretten_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-16T19:06:19Z
dc.date.available2013-07-16T19:06:19Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-27
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.descriptionCitation: Skelsey, P., . . . & Garret, K. (2013). Why dispersal should be maximized at intermediate scales of heterogeneity. Theoretical Ecology, 6(2), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-012-0171-3
dc.description.abstractDispersal is a fundamental biological process that results in the redistribution of organisms due to the interplay between the mode of dispersal, the range of scales over which movement occurs, and the scale of spatial heterogeneity, in which patchiness may occur across a broad range of scales. Despite the diversity of dispersal mechanisms and dispersal length scales in nature, we posit that a fundamental scaling relationship should exist between dispersal and spatial heterogeneity. We present both a conceptual model and mathematical formalization of this expected relationship between the scale of dispersal and the scale of patchiness, which predicts that the magnitude of dispersal (number of individuals) among patches should be maximized when the scale of spatial heterogeneity (defined in terms of patch size and isolation) is neither too fine nor too coarse relative to the gap-crossing abilities of a species. We call this the “dispersal scaling hypothesis” (DSH). We demonstrate congruence in the functional form of this relationship under fundamentally different dispersal assumptions, using well-documented isotropic dispersal kernels and empirically derived dispersal parameters from diverse species, in order to explore the generality of this finding. The DSH generates testable hypotheses as to when and under what landscape scenarios dispersal is most likely to be successful. This provides insights into what management scenarios might be necessary to either restore landscape connectivity, as in certain conservation applications, or disrupt connectivity, as when attempting to manage landscapes to impede the spread of an invasive species, pest, or pathogen.en_US
dc.description.versionArticle: Version of Record
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15981
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-012-0171-3en_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectSpatial heterogeneityen_US
dc.subjectMovementen_US
dc.subjectPopulation connectivityen_US
dc.subjectPatchinessen_US
dc.subjectHabitat fragmentationen_US
dc.subjectMatrix resistanceen_US
dc.titleWhy dispersal should be maximized at intermediate scales of heterogeneityen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GarrettTheoreticalEcol2013.pdf
Size:
255.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: