Urea vs. soybean meal in wintering and finishing rations for beef steers

dc.citation.epage39en_US
dc.citation.spage37en_US
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, D.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, E.F.
dc.contributor.authorBrent, B.E.
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-17T15:04:18Z
dc.date.available2011-03-17T15:04:18Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-17
dc.date.published1968en_US
dc.description.abstractA previous test using sorghum silage (Kans. Agri. Expt. Sta. Bull. 507:5, 1967) indicated that 3 pounds of grain per day in silage would supply enough available energy for reasonably good utilization of nonprotein nitrogen (urea). However, additional grain apparently increased the utilization of urea. This is the second test to obtain information on the minimum amount of readily available energy as grain necessary for efficient utilization of nonprotein nitrogen as a substitute for natural protein. During the wintering phase, the roughage was corn silage with an average of 38.5% dry matter. Grain made up 27% of the dry matter. Prairie hay replaced the silage in the finishing phase. Supplemental treatments are shown in the tables giving the results.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1968, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, May 3, 1968en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/8104
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1968en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 518en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectUrea vs. soybean mealen_US
dc.subjectWinter rationsen_US
dc.subjectFinishing rationsen_US
dc.titleUrea vs. soybean meal in wintering and finishing rations for beef steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle68pg37-39.pdf
Size:
124.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: