Calf health and performance during receiving is not changed by fence-line preconditioning on flint hills range vs. drylot preconditioning

dc.citation.epage45en_US
dc.citation.spage40en_US
dc.contributor.authorBailey, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorPreedy, G.W.
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorJaeger, John R.
dc.contributor.authorWaggoner, Justin W.
dc.contributor.authorOlson, K. C.
dc.contributor.authoreidjrjaegeren_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjwaggonen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidkcolsonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T17:25:30Z
dc.date.available2013-03-19T17:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-19
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractRanch-of-origin preconditioning can improve the welfare and performance of beef calves by decreasing the stress associated with weaning, transport, diet change, and commingling with other calves. Preconditioning methods that involve pasture weaning coupled with maternal contact (i.e., fence-line weaning) have been promoted as possible best management practices for minimizing stress. Prior studies focused on performance and behavior during preconditioning on the ranch of origin. Little information has been published relating to carryover effects of fence-line preconditioning compared with conventional drylot preconditioning on performance and behavior during feedlot receiving. Our objectives were to measure growth and health during a 28-day ranch-of-origin preconditioning phase and during a 60-day feedlot receiving phase among beef calves subjected to 1 of 3 ranch-of-origin preconditioning programs: (1) drylot preconditioning + dam separation, (2) pasture preconditioning + fence-line contact with dams, and (3) pasture preconditioning + fence-line contact with dams + supplemental feed delivered in a bunk. In addition, we recorded incidences of behavioral distress among these treatments during first 7 days of feedlot receiving.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2013, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 1, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15358
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 13-162-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1083en_US
dc.subjectCattleen_US
dc.subjectCalf performanceen_US
dc.subjectDrylot preconditioningen_US
dc.subjectFence-line preconditioningen_US
dc.titleCalf health and performance during receiving is not changed by fence-line preconditioning on flint hills range vs. drylot preconditioningen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cattle13pg40-45.pdf
Size:
128.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: