SQl/DS Tool Support and Third-Party Vendors: What's on the Horizon?
dc.citation.epage | 76 | |
dc.citation.issue | 10 | |
dc.citation.jtitle | DATABASE Programming & Design | |
dc.citation.spage | 75 | |
dc.citation.volume | 5 | |
dc.contributor.author | Eaton, Roger G. | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | reaton | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-21T20:56:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-21T20:56:08Z | |
dc.date.published | 1992 | |
dc.description | Citation: Eaton, R. (1992). SQl/DS Tool Support and Third-Party Vendors: What's on the Horizon? DATABASE Programming & Design, 5(10) 75-76 | |
dc.description.abstract | In the beginning, there was SQL/DS. Developed by IBM as an expansion to Sequel (a derivative of its first relational DBMS effort, System R), it served VSE/SP installations, and later, VM/SP. Its reception was lukewarm. SQL/DS was slow out of the gate, perhaps due to the lack of complimentary products. Managing an SQL/DS database requires more set-up than the standard VSAM delete and define. Although the number of SQL/OS licenses has reached 7,500 to 8,000, few shops have given SQL/DS the nod as their "first team" data structure. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/32827 | |
dc.rights | Copyright 1993 by Miller Freeman, Inc. If you are the copyright holder of this work and would like to have this item removed, please contact Kansas State University Libraries. CADS@ksu.edu. (785) 532-7444. | |
dc.subject | SQL/DS | |
dc.subject | Relational Databases | |
dc.subject | DBMS | |
dc.subject | Data Definition Language | |
dc.title | SQl/DS Tool Support and Third-Party Vendors: What's on the Horizon? | |
dc.type | Text |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1