Aging method, USDA quality grade, and endpoint temperature affect eating quality of beef longissimus lumborum steaks

dc.citation.epage100en_US
dc.citation.spage97en_US
dc.contributor.authorObuz, E.
dc.contributor.authorGok, V.
dc.contributor.authorAkaya, L.
dc.contributor.authorDikeman, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authoreidmdikemanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-03T16:41:50Z
dc.date.available2012-04-03T16:41:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-03
dc.date.published2012en_US
dc.description.abstractTenderness is one of the most important factors affecting consumers’ perceptions and acceptance of palatability. Tenderness is affected by both myofibrillar proteins and connective tissue content and quality. Both marbling and carcass maturity can have a significant effect on beef palatability, with higher consumer sensory scores generally given to USDA Choice loin steaks than to Select steaks for tenderness, juiciness, and overall palatability. Endpoint temperature can also have a significant effect, with higher endpoint temperatures generally decreasing palatability. Aging beef is a common practice in the meat industry because it increases tenderness and flavor development. The meat industry generally utilizes two types of aging, vacuum and dry aging. Vacuum aging, in which meat is aged in a sealed barrier package at refrigerated temperatures, is the most widely used practice. Dry aging refers to aging meat without packaging, and requires greater environmental control to achieve consistent product quality. Vacuum-aged beef has a sourer and stronger bloody/serumy flavor, whereas dry-aged beef has a more beefy, brown-roasted flavor. Dry aging generally results in greater aged flavor of steaks with no advantage for tenderness, and it is a costly procedure because of decreased yields due to greater weight and trim losses than vacuum aging. Flavor benefits of dry aging and distinct yield advantages of vacuum aging stimulated researchers to develop a “special bag” with a very high water vapor transmission rate and very low oxygen transmission rate to decrease shrink and trim loss but create a dry-aged flavor.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2012, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/13574
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen's Day, 2012en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 12-231-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1065en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfBeef Cattle Research, 2012 is known as Cattlemen's Day, 2012en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectQuality gradeen_US
dc.subjectTemperatureen_US
dc.subjectLongissimus lumborumen_US
dc.subjectTendernessen_US
dc.titleAging method, USDA quality grade, and endpoint temperature affect eating quality of beef longissimus lumborum steaksen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle12pg97-100.pdf
Size:
253.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: