| dc.citation.epage | 13 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 12 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Heekin, M.D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kiracofe, G.H. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-15T13:34:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-12-15T13:34:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-12-15 | |
| dc.date.published | 1983 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Testosterone propionate and testosterone enanthate treated cows were equally effective as heat detectors but the testosterone enanthate treatment required at least 9 fewer injections and less time from first injection unit the cow was active as a detector. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 2003, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 4, 1983 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6960 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen's Day, 1983 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 427 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
| dc.subject | Heat detector | en_US |
| dc.subject | Testosterone | en_US |
| dc.subject | Enanthate | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison of two testosterone treatments for heat detector cows | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文