Laboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlots

dc.citation.doi10.1186/2251-6832-4-41en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.citation.spage41en_US
dc.citation.volume4en_US
dc.contributor.authorAguilar, Orlando A.
dc.contributor.authorMaghirang, Ronaldo G.
dc.contributor.authorTrabue, Steven L.
dc.contributor.authorRice, Charles W.
dc.contributor.authorErickson, Larry E.
dc.contributor.authoreidrmaghiren_US
dc.contributor.authoreidcwriceen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidlericken_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T17:54:24Z
dc.date.available2014-03-06T17:54:24Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractPen surface amendments for mitigating emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as nitrous oxide (N2O), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2), from beef cattle feedlots, were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions. Amendments were organic residues (i.e., sorghum straw, prairie grass, woodchip), biochar from those organic residues and from beef cattle manure, and activated carbon. Manure samples were collected from several randomly selected pens from two beef cattle feedlots in Kansas and used in the experiments, either as dry (0.10 g · gˉ¹ wet basis water content) or moist (0.35 g · gˉ¹ wet basis). For each amendment, four different treatment levels (i.e., amounts of material) were placed on top of manure samples in glass containers and analyzed for GHG emissions using a photo-acoustic infrared multi-gas analyzer. From measured concentrations, emission rates were determined. For the dry manure conditions, all amendment materials showed significant reduction of N2O and CO2 emissions compared to the control (i.e., no amendment). For the moist manure conditions, none of the amendments showed significant effects on GHG emissions during the first 8 days; at days 10 and 15 after application, however, the biochar materials performed significantly better than the control (i.e., no surface amendment) in reducing N2O and CH4 emissions. No significant difference was observed in GHG emissions when the amendments were placed on top or mixed within the top surface layer of the manure.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/17207
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-41en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
dc.subjectBiocharen_US
dc.subjectFeedlot emissionen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissionen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas controlen_US
dc.subjectOrganic residueen_US
dc.subjectSurface amendmenten_US
dc.titleLaboratory evaluation of surface amendments for controlling greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle feedlotsen_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EricksonIJEEE2013.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: