Yield, chemical composition, and feeding value of winter cereal silages and hays: A 3 year study

dc.citation.epage198en_US
dc.citation.spage190en_US
dc.contributor.authorAzimi, S.
dc.contributor.authorBolsen, K.
dc.contributor.authorLaytimi, A.
dc.contributor.authorEsmail, S.H.M.
dc.contributor.authorHoover, J.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Q.K.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-01T22:13:58Z
dc.date.available2010-12-01T22:13:58Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-01
dc.date.published1988en_US
dc.description.abstractThree trials were conducted to compare silage and hay yields and feeding values of winter cereal foraged harvested in the boot and dough stages of maturity. Included were triticale; common rye; Kanby barley; and Centurk, Arkan, and Bounty 205 wheats. As expected, forage dry matter (DM) yields were higher at the dough stage then boot stage, and silage yields tended to be higher than those for hay. In Trials 2 and 3 (1986-87), barley and rye forage yields were lower than wheat yields. In all three years, wet weather conditions made hay-making difficult. In Trial 1, cattle performance from dough stage wheat (Centurk) and triticale, both silages and hays, was very poor, with daily gains from .9 to 1.2 lb and DM intakes below 2.0% of body weight. Triticale and Centurk wheat forages were high in fiber, and their dough silages had low intakes and digestibilities. Digestion trial results indicated that Arkan and Bounty wheats, Kanby barley, and rye generally had higher feeding values at the boot stage than at the dough stage, and that how well the silage or hay was preserved was a major factor influencing final feeding values.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1988, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1988en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6709
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 88-363-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1988en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 539en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectYielden_US
dc.subjectFeed valueen_US
dc.subjectChemical compositionen_US
dc.subjectCereal silagesen_US
dc.subjectHayen_US
dc.titleYield, chemical composition, and feeding value of winter cereal silages and hays: A 3 year studyen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle88pg190-198.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: