Hog Feeders?

dc.citation.epage10en_US
dc.citation.spage7en_US
dc.contributor.authorHines, Robert H.
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-15T21:47:02Z
dc.date.available2010-04-15T21:47:02Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-15T21:47:02Z
dc.date.published1988en_US
dc.description.abstractDuring the past 6 yr, extensive research has been conducted at KSU to evaluate feeding systems and various types of wet and dry feeders. Comparisons have been made between timed-feeding and ad libitum feeding systems using dry or wet feeders. Timed-feeding did not improve pig performance (ADG, F/G) when compared with ad libitum dry feeding. Wet feeding in most of the trials resulted in approximately 5% improvement in both average daily gain and feed efficiency. Feeding hogs with an oval or rectangular dry feeder resulted in similar pig performance. A11 feeders were easily adjusted to reduce feed wastage to a minimum.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 17, 1988en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3631
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 1988en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 88-149-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 556en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectSwine technologyen_US
dc.subjectFeeding systemsen_US
dc.subjectDry or wet feedersen_US
dc.titleHog Feeders?en_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine88pg7-10.pdf
Size:
259.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections