A comparison of different methods of getting cattle on a high grain ration and the value of prairie hay in finishing rations
dc.citation.epage | 33 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 31 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Clark, M.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, E.F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Richardson, D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dunn, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boren, Fred W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-28T17:48:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-04-28T17:48:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-04-28 | |
dc.date.published | 1965 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Cottonseed hulls have been used extensively in cattle rations as a source of roughage; the content in the ration is usually gradually lowered until the desired amount of concentrate is being consumed. In this study wheat bran was compared with cottonseed hulls for roughage. Since the question whether either feed was necessary arose, a third treatment was added where the heifers were turned directly on the self-feeder, in addition to the concentrate mixture in the self-feeder. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | 52nd Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, May 1, 1965 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8500 | |
dc.publisher | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 52nd Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day, 1964-1965 Progress Reports | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Bulletin (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station); B-483 | en_US |
dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
dc.subject | Cottonseed hulls | en_US |
dc.subject | Wheat bran | en_US |
dc.subject | Heifers | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of different methods of getting cattle on a high grain ration and the value of prairie hay in finishing rations | en_US |
dc.type | Article (author version) | en_US |