A comparison of different methods of getting cattle on a high grain ration and the value of prairie hay in finishing rations

dc.citation.epage33en_US
dc.citation.spage31en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, M.C.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, E.F.
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, D.
dc.contributor.authorDunn, L.
dc.contributor.authorBoren, Fred W.
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-28T17:48:17Z
dc.date.available2011-04-28T17:48:17Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-28
dc.date.published1965en_US
dc.description.abstractCottonseed hulls have been used extensively in cattle rations as a source of roughage; the content in the ration is usually gradually lowered until the desired amount of concentrate is being consumed. In this study wheat bran was compared with cottonseed hulls for roughage. Since the question whether either feed was necessary arose, a third treatment was added where the heifers were turned directly on the self-feeder, in addition to the concentrate mixture in the self-feeder.en_US
dc.description.conference52nd Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, May 1, 1965en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/8500
dc.publisherKansas Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOf52nd Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day, 1964-1965 Progress Reportsen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfBulletin (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station); B-483en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectCottonseed hullsen_US
dc.subjectWheat branen_US
dc.subjectHeifersen_US
dc.titleA comparison of different methods of getting cattle on a high grain ration and the value of prairie hay in finishing rationsen_US
dc.typeArticle (author version)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle65pg31-33.pdf
Size:
337.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: