| dc.citation.epage | 33 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 31 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Clark, M.C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Smith, E.F. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Richardson, D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dunn, L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Boren, Fred W. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-28T17:48:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-04-28T17:48:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-04-28 | |
| dc.date.published | 1965 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Cottonseed hulls have been used extensively in cattle rations as a source of roughage; the content in the ration is usually gradually lowered until the desired amount of concentrate is being consumed. In this study wheat bran was compared with cottonseed hulls for roughage. Since the question whether either feed was necessary arose, a third treatment was added where the heifers were turned directly on the self-feeder, in addition to the concentrate mixture in the self-feeder. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | 52nd Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, May 1, 1965 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8500 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | 52nd Annual Livestock Feeders’ Day, 1964-1965 Progress Reports | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Bulletin (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station); B-483 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cottonseed hulls | en_US |
| dc.subject | Wheat bran | en_US |
| dc.subject | Heifers | en_US |
| dc.title | A comparison of different methods of getting cattle on a high grain ration and the value of prairie hay in finishing rations | en_US |
| dc.type | Article (author version) | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文