| dc.contributor.author | Falowo, Moses Olanrewaju | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-14T16:28:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-14T16:28:07Z | |
| dc.date.graduationmonth | May | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Carbonate reservoirs exhibit complex pore architectures, including moldic, vuggy, intercrystalline, and fracture porosity, that produce wide-ranging elastic-modulus-porosity relationships and frequency-dependent velocity dispersion. Standard Gassmann fluid-substitution workflows, which assume pore-pressure equilibration in the low-frequency limit, are insufficient to describe the measured ultrasonic response of these rocks, where squirt flow through compliant microcracks can generate measurable stiffening of the saturated frame. This study presents a calibrated Mavko-Jizba squirt-flow analysis of five dolomite core plugs from the Mississippian carbonate interval of the Wellington Field, south-central Kansas. Compressional- and shear-wave velocities and quality factors were measured at eight ultrasonic frequencies (156.3 kHz to 20 MHz) under three fluid-saturation states: brine, partial brine, and oil-and-brine. A constrained inversion procedure employing differential-evolution global search followed by L-BFGS-B refinement recovers a hierarchical parameter set separating global mineral properties, sample-specific frame properties, and saturation-dependent squirt-flow parameters. The calibrated model reproduces both V_P and V_S across the analyzed frequency band with tight clustering around the 1:1 parity line and no systematic bias. Attenuation predictions capture the first-order behavior of the measured quality factors but display wider scatter, reflecting both the intrinsic uncertainty of laboratory Q estimation and unresolved pore-scale heterogeneity. Attenuation contrasts between saturation states exceed the corresponding velocity contrasts, indicating that Q-based attributes provide greater fluid sensitivity than velocity in this low-porosity dolomite dataset. Porosity values recovered from the calibration are broadly consistent with independent laboratory estimates. Leave-one-sample-out cross-validation, performed with global parameters held fixed, indicates internal stability within the five-sample dataset and no obvious overfitting across the sampled heterogeneity. The results provide a calibrated laboratory workflow for applying the Mavko-Jizba framework to tight carbonate data and establish new experimental constraints on effective squirt-flow parameters in dolomitic lithologies. In a complementary field-scale investigation, a deep-learning pipeline is developed for automated CO₂ plume segmentation from frequency-decomposed seismic amplitude-difference maps at the Sleipner storage site, North Sea. An ensemble of encoder-decoder architectures (UNet++, MAnet, DeepLabV3+, FPN) trained on eleven spectral bands achieves a mean Dice coefficient of 0.937 and mean intersection-over-union of 0.882 under leave-one-out cross-validation, demonstrating that frequency decomposition improves plume delineation relative to full-bandwidth data alone. Together, the two studies illustrate the diagnostic value of frequency-dependent seismic attributes from laboratory ultrasonic measurements through field-scale monitoring. | |
| dc.description.advisor | Abdelmoneam Raef | |
| dc.description.degree | Master of Science | |
| dc.description.department | Department of Geology | |
| dc.description.level | Masters | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2097/47168 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.subject | Squirt-flow model | |
| dc.subject | Deep learning | |
| dc.subject | Frequency decomposition | |
| dc.subject | Mississippian dolomite | |
| dc.subject | Ultrasonic velocity dispersion | |
| dc.subject | CO2 plume segmentation | |
| dc.title | Calibrated squirt-flow analysis of Mississippian dolomites and deep-learning CO₂ plume segmentation from frequency-decomposed seismic data | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文