| dc.citation.doi | doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.09.005 | en_US |
| dc.citation.epage | 578 | en_US |
| dc.citation.issue | 4 | en_US |
| dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Retailing | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 563 | en_US |
| dc.citation.volume | 87 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Cai, Gangshu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Ying-Ju | |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | gcai | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-21T15:20:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-03-21T15:20:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-03-21 | |
| dc.date.published | 2011 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In the contemporary e-business, a retailer may display the links to the competing retailers directly (direct referral), or display the referral link provided by a third-party advertising agency (third-party referral), and these referrals may be either one-way or two-way. In this paper, we show that the referrals may align the retailers’ incentives and facilitate implicit collusion, and one-way referral may result in a win-win situation, thereby providing an economic rationale for these seemingly puzzling phenomena. Using third-party referrals may enhance the retail-ers’ collusion despite the potential disutility and revenue leakage, and referral services may be detrimental for the consumer welfare. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13536 | |
| dc.relation.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435911000856 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Retailer referral | en_US |
| dc.subject | Third-party referral | en_US |
| dc.subject | Channel competition | en_US |
| dc.subject | Game theory | en_US |
| dc.title | In-store referrals on the internet | en_US |
| dc.type | Article (author version) | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文