In-store referrals on the internet
dc.citation.doi | doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.09.005 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 578 | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Retailing | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 563 | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 87 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cai, Gangshu | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Ying-Ju | |
dc.contributor.authoreid | gcai | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-21T15:20:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-21T15:20:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-03-21 | |
dc.date.published | 2011 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In the contemporary e-business, a retailer may display the links to the competing retailers directly (direct referral), or display the referral link provided by a third-party advertising agency (third-party referral), and these referrals may be either one-way or two-way. In this paper, we show that the referrals may align the retailers’ incentives and facilitate implicit collusion, and one-way referral may result in a win-win situation, thereby providing an economic rationale for these seemingly puzzling phenomena. Using third-party referrals may enhance the retail-ers’ collusion despite the potential disutility and revenue leakage, and referral services may be detrimental for the consumer welfare. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/13536 | |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435911000856 | en_US |
dc.subject | Retailer referral | en_US |
dc.subject | Third-party referral | en_US |
dc.subject | Channel competition | en_US |
dc.subject | Game theory | en_US |
dc.title | In-store referrals on the internet | en_US |
dc.type | Article (author version) | en_US |