Implant comparisons in grazing and finishing spayed heifers
| dc.citation.epage | 82 | en_US |
| dc.citation.spage | 80 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Laudert, S.B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuhl, Gerry L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Edwards, A.J. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-03T21:46:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-12-03T21:46:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010-12-03 | |
| dc.date.published | 1987 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Heifers that were flank-spayed plus rumen-ovarian autografted (FS+A) responded similarly to Ralgro®, Synovex-H®, and Synovex-S® implants on' pasture. Grazing heifers spayed by the Kimberling-Rupp technique also responded similarly to Synovex-H and Synovex-S implants. During the finishing phase, heifers implanted with Synovex-S gained 5.7% faster than heifers implanted with Ralgro, and those implanted with Synovex-H were intermediate in performance. There was no statistical interaction between spaying method and implant treatment during either the grazing or finishing phases. | en_US |
| dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 1987, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1987 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6800 | |
| dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 1987 | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 87-309-S | en_US |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 514 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
| dc.subject | Implant | en_US |
| dc.subject | Heifers | en_US |
| dc.subject | Spayed | en_US |
| dc.title | Implant comparisons in grazing and finishing spayed heifers | en_US |
| dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |
