Springtime dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) control with seven postemergence herbicides applied at three anthesis stages

dc.citation.epage1216en_US
dc.citation.issue9en_US
dc.citation.jtitleHortScienceen_US
dc.citation.spage1212en_US
dc.citation.volume49en_US
dc.contributor.authorRaudenbush, Zane
dc.contributor.authorKeeley, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authoreidskeeleyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-04T15:03:34Z
dc.date.available2015-03-04T15:03:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-04
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough spring is not considered the optimal time for herbicidal control of most cool-season broadleaf weeds in turfgrass, spring applications are often required. Most new postemergence broadleaf herbicides combine several active ingredients, possibly resulting in synergistic, antagonistic, or additive effects. Therefore, as new herbicides become available, information is needed about their performance when applied in the spring. The objective of our study was to determine the effect of spring application timing on dandelion control with seven commercially available postemergence herbicides. Products were applied at their lowest labeled rate for dandelion control at three spring application timings, which coincided with dandelion anthesis stages (pre-, peak-, or post-bloom). A grid was used to determine percent dandelion control at several rating dates. The 2010 site had a denser turfgrass stand with smaller dandelions and was irrigated more frequently compared with the 2011 site. In 2010, all herbicides gave 98% or greater control at 30 days after treatment (DAT) when applied post-bloom; when applied pre- or peak-bloom, control was 80% or greater for all herbicides except for two products applied peak-bloom. At pre- and peak-bloom, products combining a protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibitor with a 2,4-D ester formulation were superior to most other herbicides. When evaluated at the end of the growing season in 2010, all herbicides provided 89% or greater control at all three timings. In 2011, with a less dense turfgrass stand, larger dandelions, and less frequent irrigation, control was more variable and shorter-lived among herbicides. When applied pre-bloom, all products containing 2,4-D provided 87% or greater control 60 DAT. Post-bloom application generally gave similar control to the pre-bloom timing. Peak-bloom application resulted in the poorest overall control at 60 DAT, but products combining a PPO inhibitor with a 2,4-D ester formulation performed better than most other herbicides. By the end of the season, dandelion regrowth caused reduced overall control at all timings, but overall control was poorest when applied at peak-bloom. In summary, peak-bloom applications should be avoided, especially if dandelion pressure is high. Products combining PPO inhibitors with ester forms of 2,4-D were most effective across all spring application timings. Products containing amine forms of 2,4-D may provide effective control if applied pre- or post-bloom.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18863
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/49/9/1212.full.pdf+htmlen_US
dc.rightsPermission to archive granted by American Society for Horticultural Science, December 3, 2014.en_US
dc.subject2,4-Den_US
dc.subjectApplication timingen_US
dc.subjectBroadleaf weed controlen_US
dc.subjectCarfentrazone-ethylen_US
dc.subjectDicambaen_US
dc.subjectPyraflufen-ethylen_US
dc.titleSpringtime dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) control with seven postemergence herbicides applied at three anthesis stagesen_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Keeley HortScience 2014.pdf
Size:
80.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: