Survey of Kansas Cow-calf producers

dc.citation.epage88en_US
dc.citation.spage87en_US
dc.contributor.authorRiley, Jack G.
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-27T14:06:54Z
dc.date.available2011-01-27T14:06:54Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-27
dc.date.published1983en_US
dc.description.abstractResults of a 1982 survey were compared to a similar survey conducted 5 years earlier to determine if the acceptance of management practices had changed during that time period. The cow herd size was similar in both surveys but there was a 6% increase in crossbred cows and a substantial change in sire breed. The breeding season had been shortened to 110 days but was still too long. There was no apparent change in acceptance of semen testing or pregnancy check but 23% more producers were using a worming program. Fly control ear tags were not available in 1977-78 but 68% were using them in 1982 (69% used 1 tag per animal and 31% used 2) with a majority tagging both the cow and calf. Implanting had increased from 25% to 58%, with 95% of those using Ralgro and 43% re-implanting at least once. In 1977-78 a feeder calf price of $47.25 per cwt. was considered desirable; $65 per cwt. was the average response in 1982.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 2003, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 4, 1983en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7089
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen's Day, 1983en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 427en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectFly controlen_US
dc.subjectFly tagsen_US
dc.subjectImplantsen_US
dc.titleSurvey of Kansas Cow-calf producersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle83pg87-88.pdf
Size:
113.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: