Managing fast- vs. slow-growth genotypes to optimize quality and yield grades

dc.citation.epage107en_US
dc.citation.spage105en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchalles, R.R.
dc.contributor.authorZoellner, K.O.
dc.contributor.authorDikeman, Michael E.
dc.contributor.authoreidmdikemanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-06T20:44:19Z
dc.date.available2010-11-06T20:44:19Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-06
dc.date.published1989en_US
dc.description.abstractFast-growth genotype steers placed on a high energy ration a month after weaning were compared to a slow-growth genotype on a growing ration for 155 days, followed by a finishing ration for 62 days. The fast-growth genotype produced heavier, higher quality carcasses in less time than the slow-growth genotype, with similar energy conversion. Using contemporary prices. the fast-growth genotype cattle broke even, and the slow-growth genotype lost $124 per head.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1989, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1989en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6494
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1989en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 89-567-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 567en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectGenotypesen_US
dc.subjectQuality gradesen_US
dc.subjectYield gradesen_US
dc.titleManaging fast- vs. slow-growth genotypes to optimize quality and yield gradesen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle89pg105-107.pdf
Size:
174.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: