Effects of preweaning and post weaning implants on suckling, growing, and finishing steer performance

dc.citation.epage61en_US
dc.citation.spage58en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimms, D.D.
dc.contributor.authorLee, R.W.
dc.contributor.authorLaudert, S.B.
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, James J.
dc.contributor.authoreidjhigginsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-03T21:10:30Z
dc.date.available2010-12-03T21:10:30Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-03
dc.date.published1986en_US
dc.description.abstractOne hundred and ninety-five crossbred steers were used to compare lifetime implant strategies and study the effects of implanting during the suckling period on performance in the growing and finishing periods. There were no differences in growing period gains when both groups were implanted in the suckling period and the growing period. However, steers implanted in the suckling period but not implanted in the growing period had significantly lower gains than all other treatments including controls. Steers implanted only in the growing period had better feed efficiency in the growing period than both controls and steers implanted only in the suckling period. Steers reimplanted during the finishing period had similar finishing gains regardless of prior implant treatment, and all implanted cattle gained faster than controls in the finishing period. Steers not reimplanted during the finishing period had lower gains than those reimplanted. Implanting in the finishing period resulted in better feed efficiency. All implanted cattle that were reimplanted in the finishing period had higher lifetime gains than controls, but there was no difference between implant combinations. The only carcass characteristic changed by implanting was quality grade, which was reduced by all implant combinations with the exception of implanting only in the finishing period. Implanting during the suckling period did not reduce cattle performance during the growing and finishing periods when the steers were also implanted during these periods. This study emphasizes the importance of implanting twice in the finishing period to maximize finishing gain and final weight.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1986, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1986en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6775
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1986en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 86-320-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 494en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectImplantsen_US
dc.subjectSucklingen_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectSteer performanceen_US
dc.titleEffects of preweaning and post weaning implants on suckling, growing, and finishing steer performanceen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle86pg58-61.pdf
Size:
199.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: