Dose-response of weanling pigs to streptococcus faecium

dc.citation.epage113en_US
dc.citation.spage107en_US
dc.contributor.authorHealy, B.J.
dc.contributor.authorHancock, Joe D.
dc.contributor.authorFung, Daniel Y. C.
dc.contributor.authorLiang, C.
dc.contributor.authorYu, S.L.
dc.contributor.authoreidjhancocken_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddfungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T15:32:53Z
dc.date.available2010-04-09T15:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-09T15:32:53Z
dc.date.published1989en_US
dc.description.abstractTwo 5-wk experiments, using a total of 270 pigs (avg initial wt of 16.1 and 13.11b), were conducted to determine the dose-response relationship between Streptococcus faecium additions to drinking water and performance of newly weaned pigs. In experiment 1, treatments were: 1) untreated control; 2, 3, and 4) .5, 2.5, and 4.5 x 109 CFU of S. faecillm/pig/d; 5) antibioticfed positive control (CSP250 and CUS04)' Bacterial content of feces collected from the pigs on d 7, 14, and 21 indicated that antibiotic feeding greatly reduced fecal content of streptococci. S. faecium given in the water (.5, 2.5, or 4.5 x 10 CFU/pig/d) slightly increased the CFU of streptococci in the feces. Giving S. faecillm in the water or antibiotics in the feed did not reduce fecal content of coliform bacteria. Antibiotic feeding improved feed intake, growth rate, and efficiency of gain when compared to the untreated control. Pigs given the highest level of S. faecium addition to the water (i.e., 4.5 x 10^9 had performance that was intermediate to that of the untreated control and positive control. In experiment 2, dosages of S. faecium were spread further apart. Treatments were: 1) untreated negative control; 2,3, and 4) 5 x 107, 5 X 109, and 5 x 1011 CFU of S. faecium/pig/d; and 5) antibiotic-fed positive control. Streptococci content of the feces was increased by giving S. faecillm in the water. However, total coliform content was not affected by giving S. faecium or antibiotics. Antibiotic feeding improved rate of gain, feed intake, and efficiency of gain, but giving S. faecium did not improve performance of pigs compared to those given the untreated control.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 16, 1989en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3563
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine day, 1989en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 90-163-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 581en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectStreptococcus faeciumen_US
dc.subjectProbioticsen_US
dc.subjectAntibioticsen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectWeanling pigen_US
dc.titleDose-response of weanling pigs to streptococcus faeciumen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dose-Response on Weanling Pigs to Streptococcus Faecium.pdf
Size:
342.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: