QUANTIFYING LEAD EXPOSURE TO PERSONNEL ON FORT RILEY RANGES

dc.contributor.authorMcKenna, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-06T19:11:52Z
dc.date.available2014-01-06T19:11:52Z
dc.date.graduationmonthDecemberen_US
dc.date.issued2014-01-06en_US
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractFort Riley Kansas is a U.S. Army military installation. In 2012 over five and a half million rounds of ammunition were fired on the training ranges (2). Most of these munitions contain lead and over time lead will accumulate on the ranges. Inhaled or ingested lead can have detrimental effects on human health. This study was conducted to determine if soldiers and range personnel are being exposed to lead particulates and if so, what are the levels of lead at the different locations. Soil, air and dust samples were collected from the ranges where personnel spend their work day and tested for the presence of lead. Many of the samples collected tested positive for lead in the areas one would expect to find lead particulates to be present on a shooting range. Soil samples collected from outside the range area showed that lead particulates are not being carried off the ranges into the surrounding training areas. However, there was a sample collected from a small arms range ammunition shed that tested positive for lead when it shouldn’t have considering the low number of ammunition fired on that range compared to other ranges ammunition sheds that tested negative for lead. This positive test resulted in multiple follow ups with different departments on Fort Riley to determine the cause of the contamination and what changes were needed. It was determined that the ammunition shed on the small arms range most likely contained lead particles because of a misunderstanding of policy by the soldiers using the range; soldiers being briefed on the proper turn-in procedures for spent ammunition casings could alleviate the lead contamination issue on this range. Reviewing current procedures in place to protect range maintenance personnel from lead exposure only raised more questions in the effectiveness of these procedures; the Fort Riley Public Health/Industrial Hygiene department will be conducting further studies to determine these risks.en_US
dc.description.advisorMichael B. Catesen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Public Healthen_US
dc.description.departmentPublic Health Interdepartmental Programen_US
dc.description.levelMastersen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/17020
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectFort Rileyen_US
dc.subjectLead exposureen_US
dc.subjectAmmunition leaden_US
dc.subject.umiPublic Health (0573)en_US
dc.titleQUANTIFYING LEAD EXPOSURE TO PERSONNEL ON FORT RILEY RANGESen_US
dc.typeReporten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McKenna Report.pdf
Size:
1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Report
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
McKenna Slides.pptx
Size:
45.67 MB
Format:
Unknown data format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: