Effect of sampling method on the accuracy and precision of estimating the mean pig weight of the population

dc.citation.epage391en_US
dc.citation.spage384en_US
dc.contributor.authorPaulk, C.B.
dc.contributor.authorHighland, G.L.
dc.contributor.authorHaydon, K.D.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorNelssen, Jim L.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authorDeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorDritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokachen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjnelssenen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddritzen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodbanden_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjderouchen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-07T22:28:21Z
dc.date.available2012-12-07T22:28:21Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-07
dc.date.published2012en_US
dc.description.abstractProducers have adopted marketing strategies such as topping to help reduce economic losses from weight discounts at the processing plant. Despite adopting these strategies, producers are still missing target weights and incurring discounts. One contributing factor is the error of sampling methods that producers use to estimate the mean weight of the population to determine the optimal time to top pigs. The standard sample size that has been adopted by many producers is 30 pigs. Our objective was to determine the best method for selecting 30 pigs to improve the accuracy and precision of estimating the mean pig weight of the population. Using a computer program developed in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), we were able to generate 10,000 sample means for different sampling procedures on 3 different datasets. Using this program we evaluated taking: (1) a completely random sample of 30 pigs from the barn, (2) a varying number of pigs per pen to achieve a total sample size of 30 pigs, (3) selecting the heaviest and lightest pig (determined visually) from 15 pens and calculating the mean from those pigs, and (4) calculating the median of the selected pigs.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 15, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15154
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 13-026-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1074en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectFinishing pigen_US
dc.subjectMean weight estimationen_US
dc.subjectSample sizeen_US
dc.titleEffect of sampling method on the accuracy and precision of estimating the mean pig weight of the populationen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
37 Sampling Method pg384-391.pdf
Size:
2.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections