Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers

dc.citation.epage35en_US
dc.citation.spage32en_US
dc.contributor.authorLaudert, S.B.
dc.contributor.authorLee, R.W.
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-01T22:13:31Z
dc.date.available2010-12-01T22:13:31Z
dc.date.issued2010-12-01
dc.date.published1987en_US
dc.description.abstractThree field trials were conducted with finishing yearling steers to compare the performance of cattle receiving Compudose® or Ralgro®/Synovex-S® and Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® reimplant combinations. No differences were found between Compudose and the reimplant programs in cattle daily gain, feed efficiency, or cost of gain. Compudose retention was 97.5% in the 1317 head implanted. Synovex-S implant site abscess rate ranged from 5.7 to 15.4%.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1987, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/6708
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1987en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 87-309-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 514en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectCompudose® vs Ralgro®en_US
dc.subjectReimplanten_US
dc.subjectSteersen_US
dc.titleCompudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steersen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle87pg32-35.pdf
Size:
213.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: