Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers
dc.citation.epage | 35 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 32 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Laudert, S.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, R.W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-01T22:13:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-12-01T22:13:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-12-01 | |
dc.date.published | 1987 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Three field trials were conducted with finishing yearling steers to compare the performance of cattle receiving Compudose® or Ralgro®/Synovex-S® and Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® reimplant combinations. No differences were found between Compudose and the reimplant programs in cattle daily gain, feed efficiency, or cost of gain. Compudose retention was 97.5% in the 1317 head implanted. Synovex-S implant site abscess rate ranged from 5.7 to 15.4%. | en_US |
dc.description.conference | Cattlemen's Day, 1987, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1987 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6708 | |
dc.publisher | Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Cattlemen’s Day, 1987 | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 87-309-S | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 514 | en_US |
dc.subject | Beef | en_US |
dc.subject | Compudose® vs Ralgro® | en_US |
dc.subject | Reimplant | en_US |
dc.subject | Steers | en_US |
dc.title | Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers | en_US |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_US |