Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or
Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant 
programs for finishing yearling steers

Laudert, S.B.; Lee, R.W.

dc.citation.epage	35	en_US
dc.citation.spage	32	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Laudert, S.B.
dc.contributor.author	Lee, R.W.
dc.date.accessioned	2010-12-01T22:13:31Z
dc.date.available	2010-12-01T22:13:31Z
dc.date.issued	2010-12-01
dc.date.published	1987	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Three field trials were conducted with finishing yearling steers to compare the performance of cattle receiving Compudose® or Ralgro®/Synovex-S® and Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® reimplant combinations. No differences were found between Compudose and the reimplant programs in cattle daily gain, feed efficiency, or cost of gain. Compudose retention was 97.5% in the 1317 head implanted. Synovex-S implant site abscess rate ranged from 5.7 to 15.4%.	en_US
dc.description.conference	Cattlemen's Day, 1987, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March, 1987	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2097/6708
dc.publisher	Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service	en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf	Cattlemen’s Day, 1987	en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf	Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 87-309-S	en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf	Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 514	en_US
dc.subject	Beef	en_US
dc.subject	Compudose® vs Ralgro®	en_US
dc.subject	Reimplant	en_US
dc.subject	Steers	en_US
dc.title	Compudose® vs Ralgro®/Synovex-S® or Synovex-S®/Synovex-S® Reimplant programs for finishing yearling steers	en_US
dc.type	Conference paper	en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: cattle87pg32-35.pdf
Size:: 213.13 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format

Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Name:: license.txt
Size:: 1.61 KB
Format:: Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Download

Collections

Cattlemen's Day, 1987