Management strategies: reproduction

dc.citation.epage7en_US
dc.citation.spage5en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, John F., 1962-
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authoreidjfsmithen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjssen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-06T20:40:23Z
dc.date.available2011-05-06T20:40:23Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-06
dc.date.published1995en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite the negative effects of milk production on some reproductive traits, calving intervals between high- and low-producing groups varied by only 9 days (414 vs 423). First-service conception rates were 8 percentage points greater in the low-producing group than in the high-producing group. However, the percentage of cows not yet inseminated that were more than 120 days in milk was 18 percentage points greater in the low- than highproducing herds. When Kansas dairy herds in the DHIA program are evaluated, the higher producing herds seem to have lower firstservice conception rates and more services per conception. However, managers of high-producing herds are doing a better job of servicing cows inseminated earlier in lactation and putting replacements into the milk string at a younger age. This occurs because managers of high-producing herds have reproductive records and heat detection programs that allow them to detect a higher percentage of the cows in heat before 120 days in milk. Fine tuning the reproductive management program also can improve the profitability of a dairy operation. The reproductive losses in high-producing herds are considerably less than those in lowproducing herds ($139 vs $203). There are no magic formulas in establishing a good reproductive program. Combining good records, diligent heat detection, and sound artificial insemination technique can increase the profitability of a dairy.en_US
dc.description.conferenceDairy Day, 1995, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 1995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/8835
dc.publisherKansas Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfDairy Day, 1995en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 96-106-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 742en_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectReproductionen_US
dc.titleManagement strategies: reproductionen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DairyDay1995pg5-7.pdf
Size:
19.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections