dc.contributor.author |
Karote, Dennis |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Walker, Brandon |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dai, Huaien |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Krishnamoorthi, Ramaswamy |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Voo, Janis |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rajagopalan, Shyamala |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-02-28T17:18:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-02-28T17:18:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-12-05 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/15331 |
|
dc.description |
Citation: Karote, Dennis, Brandon Walker, Huaien Dai, Ramaswamy Krishnamoorthi, Janis Voo, and Shyamala Rajagopalan. “Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants in Gamble’s Fluid: Is the Fluid Toxic? Can It Be Made Safer by Inclusion of Solid Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides?” Edited by Meehir Palit. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (December 5, 2012): 641620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620. |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The reactions of chemical warfare agent simulants, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES) and di-i-propyl fluoro phosphate (DFP), in fluids have been investigated. Data analyses confirm the major degradation pathway to be hydrolysis of 2-CEES to 2-hydroxyethyl ethyl sulfide, along with minor self-condensation products. Among the three fluids examined, 2-CEES degradation was the fastest in Gamble’s fluid during a 96 h period. Upon addition of Exceptional Hazard Attenuation Materials (EHAMs) to 2-CEES containing Gamble’s fluid, degradation was generally improved during the first 24 h period. The 96 h outcome was similar for fluid samples with or without EHAM 2 and EHAM 4. EHAM 1-added fluid contained only one degradation product, 2-nitroethyl ethyl sulfide. DFP degradation was the slowest in Gamble’s fluid, but was enhanced by the addition of EHAMs. FTIR and solid state 31P NMR confirm the destructive adsorption of 2-CEES and DFP by the EHAMs. The results collectively demonstrate that 2-CEES and DFP decompose to various extents in Gamble’s fluid over a 96 h period but the fluid still contains a considerable amount of intact simulant. EHAM 1 appears to be promising for 2-CEES and DFP mitigation while EHAM 2 and EHAM 4 work well for early on concentration reduction of 2-CEES and DFP. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.relation.uri |
http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620 |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
|
dc.subject |
Chemical warfare |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Gamble’s fluid |
en_US |
dc.subject |
2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide |
en_US |
dc.subject |
di-i-propyl fluoro phosphate |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Exceptional Hazard Attenuation Materials |
en_US |
dc.title |
Chemical warfare agent simulants in Gamble’s fluid: Is the fluid toxic? Can it be made safer by inclusion of solid nanocrystalline metal oxides? |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article (publisher version) |
en_US |
dc.date.published |
2013 |
en_US |
dc.citation.doi |
10.1155/2013/641620 |
en_US |
dc.citation.issue |
641620 |
en_US |
dc.citation.jtitle |
Journal of Chemistry |
en_US |
dc.citation.volume |
2013 |
en_US |
dc.citation |
Karote, Dennis, Brandon Walker, Huaien Dai, Ramaswamy Krishnamoorthi, Janis Voo, and Shyamala Rajagopalan. “Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants in Gamble’s Fluid: Is the Fluid Toxic? Can It Be Made Safer by Inclusion of Solid Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides?” Edited by Meehir Palit. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (December 5, 2012): 641620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620. |
|
dc.contributor.authoreid |
krish |
en_US |