| dc.citation | Karote, Dennis, Brandon Walker, Huaien Dai, Ramaswamy Krishnamoorthi, Janis Voo, and Shyamala Rajagopalan. “Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants in Gamble’s Fluid: Is the Fluid Toxic? Can It Be Made Safer by Inclusion of Solid Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides?” Edited by Meehir Palit. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (December 5, 2012): 641620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620. | |
| dc.citation.doi | 10.1155/2013/641620 | en_US |
| dc.citation.issue | 641620 | en_US |
| dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Chemistry | en_US |
| dc.citation.volume | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Karote, Dennis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Walker, Brandon | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dai, Huaien | |
| dc.contributor.author | Krishnamoorthi, Ramaswamy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Voo, Janis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rajagopalan, Shyamala | |
| dc.contributor.authoreid | krish | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-02-28T17:18:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-02-28T17:18:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-12-05 | |
| dc.date.published | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.description | Citation: Karote, Dennis, Brandon Walker, Huaien Dai, Ramaswamy Krishnamoorthi, Janis Voo, and Shyamala Rajagopalan. “Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants in Gamble’s Fluid: Is the Fluid Toxic? Can It Be Made Safer by Inclusion of Solid Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides?” Edited by Meehir Palit. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (December 5, 2012): 641620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620. | |
| dc.description.abstract | The reactions of chemical warfare agent simulants, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES) and di-i-propyl fluoro phosphate (DFP), in fluids have been investigated. Data analyses confirm the major degradation pathway to be hydrolysis of 2-CEES to 2-hydroxyethyl ethyl sulfide, along with minor self-condensation products. Among the three fluids examined, 2-CEES degradation was the fastest in Gamble’s fluid during a 96 h period. Upon addition of Exceptional Hazard Attenuation Materials (EHAMs) to 2-CEES containing Gamble’s fluid, degradation was generally improved during the first 24 h period. The 96 h outcome was similar for fluid samples with or without EHAM 2 and EHAM 4. EHAM 1-added fluid contained only one degradation product, 2-nitroethyl ethyl sulfide. DFP degradation was the slowest in Gamble’s fluid, but was enhanced by the addition of EHAMs. FTIR and solid state 31P NMR confirm the destructive adsorption of 2-CEES and DFP by the EHAMs. The results collectively demonstrate that 2-CEES and DFP decompose to various extents in Gamble’s fluid over a 96 h period but the fluid still contains a considerable amount of intact simulant. EHAM 1 appears to be promising for 2-CEES and DFP mitigation while EHAM 2 and EHAM 4 work well for early on concentration reduction of 2-CEES and DFP. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2097/15331 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.relation.uri | http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620 | en_US |
| dc.rights | Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Chemical warfare | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gamble’s fluid | en_US |
| dc.subject | 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide | en_US |
| dc.subject | di-i-propyl fluoro phosphate | en_US |
| dc.subject | Exceptional Hazard Attenuation Materials | en_US |
| dc.title | Chemical warfare agent simulants in Gamble’s fluid: Is the fluid toxic? Can it be made safer by inclusion of solid nanocrystalline metal oxides? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article (publisher version) | en_US |
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
فارسی
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
繁体中文