dc.citationKarote, Dennis, Brandon Walker, Huaien Dai, Ramaswamy Krishnamoorthi, Janis Voo, and Shyamala Rajagopalan. “Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants in Gamble’s Fluid: Is the Fluid Toxic? Can It Be Made Safer by Inclusion of Solid Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides?” Edited by Meehir Palit. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (December 5, 2012): 641620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620.
dc.citation.doi10.1155/2013/641620en_US
dc.citation.issue641620en_US
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Chemistryen_US
dc.citation.volume2013en_US
dc.contributor.authorKarote, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorDai, Huaien
dc.contributor.authorKrishnamoorthi, Ramaswamy
dc.contributor.authorVoo, Janis
dc.contributor.authorRajagopalan, Shyamala
dc.contributor.authoreidkrishen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-28T17:18:37Z
dc.date.available2013-02-28T17:18:37Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-05
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.descriptionCitation: Karote, Dennis, Brandon Walker, Huaien Dai, Ramaswamy Krishnamoorthi, Janis Voo, and Shyamala Rajagopalan. “Chemical Warfare Agent Simulants in Gamble’s Fluid: Is the Fluid Toxic? Can It Be Made Safer by Inclusion of Solid Nanocrystalline Metal Oxides?” Edited by Meehir Palit. Journal of Chemistry 2013 (December 5, 2012): 641620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620.
dc.description.abstractThe reactions of chemical warfare agent simulants, 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide (2-CEES) and di-i-propyl fluoro phosphate (DFP), in fluids have been investigated. Data analyses confirm the major degradation pathway to be hydrolysis of 2-CEES to 2-hydroxyethyl ethyl sulfide, along with minor self-condensation products. Among the three fluids examined, 2-CEES degradation was the fastest in Gamble’s fluid during a 96 h period. Upon addition of Exceptional Hazard Attenuation Materials (EHAMs) to 2-CEES containing Gamble’s fluid, degradation was generally improved during the first 24 h period. The 96 h outcome was similar for fluid samples with or without EHAM 2 and EHAM 4. EHAM 1-added fluid contained only one degradation product, 2-nitroethyl ethyl sulfide. DFP degradation was the slowest in Gamble’s fluid, but was enhanced by the addition of EHAMs. FTIR and solid state 31P NMR confirm the destructive adsorption of 2-CEES and DFP by the EHAMs. The results collectively demonstrate that 2-CEES and DFP decompose to various extents in Gamble’s fluid over a 96 h period but the fluid still contains a considerable amount of intact simulant. EHAM 1 appears to be promising for 2-CEES and DFP mitigation while EHAM 2 and EHAM 4 work well for early on concentration reduction of 2-CEES and DFP.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15331
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1155/2013/641620en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subjectChemical warfareen_US
dc.subjectGamble’s fluiden_US
dc.subject2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfideen_US
dc.subjectdi-i-propyl fluoro phosphateen_US
dc.subjectExceptional Hazard Attenuation Materialsen_US
dc.titleChemical warfare agent simulants in Gamble’s fluid: Is the fluid toxic? Can it be made safer by inclusion of solid nanocrystalline metal oxides?en_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KrishnamoorthiJChem2013.pdf
Size:
2.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: