Comparison of protein sources for phase II starter diets

K-REx Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hansen, J.A.
dc.contributor.author Tokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.author Goodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.author Nelssen, Jim L.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-02T17:32:11Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-02T17:32:11Z
dc.date.issued 2010-04-02T17:32:11Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2097/3502
dc.description.abstract A total of 432 weanling pigs (initially 15.3 lb and 21 d of age) was used in a growth trial to compare various protein sources in the Phase II starter diet. During Phase I (0 to 7 d post-weaning), all pigs were fed a common high nutrient density diet containing 1.5% lysine, 10% porcine plasma, 10% lactose, and 20% dried whey. During Phase II (7 to 28 d post-weaning), pigs were fed one of six experimental diets. All Phase II diets contained 10% dried whey and were formulated to 1.18% lysine. The positive control diet contained 4% menhaden fish meal (FISH). Synthetic amino acids were used to replace fish meal to form an ideal protein, negative control diet (AA). Spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP), spray-dried blood meal (SDBM), soy protein concentrate (SPC), and extruded soy protein concentrate (ESPC) replaced fish meal on a lysine basis to form the other four diets. During the grower phase (28 to 56 d postweaning), all pigs were fed a common 1.1% lysine, milo-soybean meal diet. Average daily gain (lb), ADFI (lb), and F/G during Phase I were .39, .53, and 1.41, respectively. During Phase II, SPC and ESPC effectively replaced fish meal as a protein source; however, pigs fed diets containing the spray-dried blood products (SDPP or SDBM) gained faster than pigs fed the other four diets. Pigs fed the diet containing synthetic amino acids had poorer feed conversion than pigs fed diets containing the intact protein sources. Pigs fed the diet containing SDBM during Phase II gained faster during the subsequent grower phase than pigs fed the other diets. Based on these results and earlier research, optimal staging of starter diets includes using SDPP in Phase I and SDPP or SDBM in Phase II. en_US
dc.publisher Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Swine day, 1991 en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 92-193-S en_US
dc.relation.isPartOf Report of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 641 en_US
dc.subject Starter en_US
dc.subject Performance en_US
dc.subject By-products en_US
dc.subject Protein en_US
dc.subject Sources en_US
dc.title Comparison of protein sources for phase II starter diets en_US
dc.type Conference paper en_US
dc.date.published 1991 en_US
dc.citation.epage 51 en_US
dc.citation.spage 48 en_US
dc.description.conference Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 21. 1991 en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid mtokach en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid goodband en_US
dc.contributor.authoreid jnelssen en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search K-REx


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics








Center for the

Advancement of Digital

Scholarship

118 Hale Library

Manhattan KS 66506


(785) 532-7444

cads@k-state.edu