Feed the Future Innovation Lab for the Reduction of Post-Harvest Loss
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/2097/35269
The Feed the Future Innovation Lab for the Reduction of Post-Harvest Loss (PHLIL) is a strategic, applied, research and education program aimed at improving global food security by reducing post-harvest losses in long-term storage crops, such as grains, oilseeds, legumes, root crops and seeds. The Lab’s efforts are focused in four Feed the Future countries: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Guatemala. Through collaborations between U.S. universities and local universities, research institutions and other partner organizations, PHLIL is conducting research, testing and outreach related to drying, storage and mycotoxin detection for these key crops. Our work seeks to increase understanding of current post-harvest loss factors and task division in rural communities and households and works toward the development of technologies usable by all household members.
Visit the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for the Reduction of Post-Harvest Loss Homepage
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 7E. Strategic Crisis Communications-Managing Mycotoxin Risk(2022-06-03) Morris, Jeffery B.Communicating about the mycotoxin threat to Nepal’s food supply, requires the science community, public authorities and professional communicators.Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 7D. Communication Strategy, Tools, and Lessons from the Aflasafe Initiative(2022-06-03) Ortega-Beltran, Alejandro; Bandyopadhyay, RanajitThe International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) is a non‐profit institution that generates agricultural innovations to meet Africa’s most pressing challenges of hunger, malnutrition, poverty, and natural resource degradation. Working with various partners across sub‐Saharan Africa, we improve livelihoods, enhance food and nutrition security, increase employment, and preserve natural resource integrity.Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 7C. Nominal Groups & Discussion Strategies(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.Moderated discussion process • In use since the 1970s • Used for mycotoxin discussions in Africa, China, Afghanistan, the US and Europe • Goals: • Equal input from all participants • Large number of ideas with rankings • Generating new thoughts and thought combinationsItem Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 7B. Safe food for a healthier Nepal: Priming a national mycotoxin response(2022-06-03) Harvey, Jagger J.W.• Low aflatoxin awareness/risky agricultural practices • Poor drying and storage practices, need for innovation packages at multiple value chain entry points (on farm, including as service provision or community-based efforts; traders/aggregators; market vendors,..) • Research capacity has been enhanced; however, expanded, hub-spoke, surveillance/mitigation, risk communication capacity is needed (provinces, academia,…) • Pair enabling policy with private sectorItem Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 6. Summary of Responses to Day 2 Nominal Group Discussion Questions(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.A. Identify Communication Strategies for Important Mycotoxin Issues of Relevance to Consumers – Pages 1-4 B. Identify Communication Strategies for Important Mycotoxin Issues of Relevance to Producers, Traders & Distributors – Pages 5-12 C. Identify Communication Strategies for Important Mycotoxin Issues of Relevance to Health Professionals – Pages 13-15 D. Identify Communication Strategies for Important Mycotoxin Issues of Relevance to Policy Makers & Regulators – Pages 16-21Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 5. Summary of Responses to Day 1 Nominal Group Questions(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.; Harvey, Jagger J.W.; Morris, Jeffery B.A. Identify Key Issues Regarding Mycotoxins of Relevance to Consumers – Pages 1-3 B. Identify Key Issues Regarding Mycotoxins of Relevance to Producers, Traders & Distributors – Pages 4-5 C. Identify Key Issues Regarding Mycotoxins of Relevance to Health Professionals – Pages 6-8 D. Identify Key Issues Regarding Mycotoxins of Relevance to Educators, Trainers & Researchers – Pages 9-11 E. Identify Key Issues Regarding Mycotoxins of Relevance to Policy Makers & Regulators – Pages 12-14Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 4. Nominal Group Discussions(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.A. Nominal Group Discussion Process Description – Pages 1-2 B. Sample Results from Dhulikhel Conference – Page 3 C. Nominal Group Question Organization Matrices for Days 1 and 2 – Page 4 D. Interpreting Nominal Group Discussion Results – Pages 5-6Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 3. Dhulikhel Conference Responses Distributed to Workshop Participants(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.; Harvey, Jagger J.W.; Morris, Jeffery B.A. Day 1 – Consumers (Pages 1-8) B. Day 1 – Producers, Traders Distributors (Pages 9-26) C. Day 1 – Health Professionals (Pages 27-31) D. Day 1 – Educators, Trainers & Researchers (Pages 32-43) E. Day 1 – Policy Makers & Regulators (Pages 44-59) F. Day 2 – Communication Considerations (Pages 60-62)Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 2. Complete Response Sets to Dhulikhel Conference Questions by Target Audience(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.; Harvey, Jagger J.W.; Morris, Jeffery B.A. Consumers (7 pages) B. Producers, Traders & Distributors (15 pages) C. Health Professionals (3 pages) D. Educators, Trainers & Researchers (8 pages) E. Policy Makers & Regulators (12 pages)Item Open Access MARS/NDRI/KSU Communications Workshop: Part 1. Introductory Material(2022-06-03) Leslie, John F.; Harvey, Jagger J.W.; Morris, Jeffery B.; Zhang, Guangtao; Gurung, JayaA. Agenda – Pages 1-2 B. List of attendees – Pages 3-4 C. Group photo of participants – Page 5Item Open Access Semi-Annual Report, 2016Kansas State University; University of Illinois; Oklahoma State University; University of Kentucky; University of Nebraska – Lincoln; South Carolina State University; Ft. Valley State University; USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research; Kansas State UniversityThe Feed the Future Innovation Lab for the Reduction of Post-Harvest Loss (PHLIL) is a strategic, applied, research and education program aimed at improving food security by reducing post-harvest loss and food waste of seeds and durable staple crops, e.g., grains, oilseeds, and legumes. The Lab’s efforts are focused in four Feed the Future countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Guatemala) and Afghanistan.Item Open Access Annual Report, 2016Kansas State University; University of Illinois; United States Agency for International Development; Kansas State UniversityThe Feed the Future Innovation Lab for the Reduction of Post-Harvest Loss (PHLIL) is a strategic, applied, research and education program aimed at improving food security by reducing post-harvest loss and food waste of seeds and durable staple crops, e.g., grains, oilseeds, and legumes. The Lab’s efforts are focused in four Feed the Future countries: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Guatemala. Projects in each country are led by Country Team Co-Leaders and overseen by a U.S. Principle Investigator (PI) and the Lab’s Director, with input from local and international academic, private sector, governmental and non-governmental organizations.Item Open Access Annual Report, 2015Kansas State University; University of Illinois; Oklahoma State University; University of Kentucky; University of Nebraska – Lincoln; South Carolina State University; Ft. Valley State University; USDA-ARS Center for Grain and Animal Health Research; Kansas State UniversityThe Feed the Future Reduction of Post-Harvest Loss Innovation Lab is a strategic and applied, research and education program aimed at improving food security by reducing post-harvest loss and food waste of seeds and durable staple crops, e.g., grains, oilseeds, and legumes. The Lab’s efforts are focused in four Feed the Future countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Guate-mala) and Afghanistan.
