|
K-State Research Exchange >
K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports >
All K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2097/867
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
|---|
| NicoleDick2008.pdf | | 784Kb | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
|
| Title: | Methods for handling missing data due to a limit of detection in longitudinal lognormal data |
| Authors: | Dick, Nicole Marie |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Graduation Month: | August |
| Type: | Report |
| Degree: | Master of Science |
| Department: | Department of Statistics |
| Major Professor: | Suzanne Dubnicka |
| Keywords: | Lognormal
Longitudinal
Limit of detection
Missing data
Repeated measures
Statistics |
| Abstract: | In animal science, challenge model studies often produce longitudinal data. Many times
the lognormal distribution is useful in modeling the data at each time point. Escherichia coli
O157 (E. coli O157) studies measure and record the concentration of colonies of the bacteria.
There are times when the concentration of colonies present is too low, falling below a limit of
detection. In these cases a zero is recorded for the concentration. Researchers employ a method
of enrichment to determine if E. coli O157 was truly not present. This enrichment process
searches for bacteria colony concentrations a second time to confirm or refute the previous
measurement. If enrichment comes back without evidence of any bacteria colonies present, a
zero remains as the observed concentration. If enrichment comes back with presence of bacteria
colonies, a minimum value is imputed for the concentration. At the conclusion of the study the
data are log10-transformed. One problem with the transformation is that the log of zero is
mathematically undefined, so any observed concentrations still recorded as a zero after
enrichment can not be log-transformed. Current practice carries the zero value from the
lognormal data to the normal data. The purpose of this report is to evaluate methods for handling
missing data due to a limit of detection and to provide results for various analyses of the
longitudinal data. Multiple methods of imputing a value for the missing data are compared.
Each method is analyzed by fitting three different models using SAS. To determine which
method is most accurately explaining the data, a simulation study was conducted. |
| Appears in Collections: | All K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
|---|
| NicoleDick2008.pdf | | 784Kb | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
|
All items in K-REx are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
