Amornthewaphat, N.Hancock, Joe D.Behnke, Keith C.McKinney, Leland J.Starkey, C.W.Lee, D.J.Jones, C.L.Park, J.S.Dean, D.W.2010-02-182010-02-182010-02-18http://hdl.handle.net/2097/2634Pigs fed from wet/dry shelf-feeders had 6.8% greater ADG compared to those fed from dry shelf-feeders and used 18.3% less water than those fed from conventional feeders.SwineFeeder designWet/Dry feederFinishing pigsEffects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder, dry shelf-feeder, and wet/dry shelf-feeder) on finishing pigsConference paper