Pohlman, F.W.Zayas, J.F.Dikeman, Michael E.Unruh, John A.2010-09-022010-09-022010-09-02http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4786Longissimus and pectoralis muscles were removed from 10 steer carcasses at 4 days postmortem , aged for 14 days at 4 ̊F, then assigned to either ultrasound (ULS) or convection (Conv) cooking to either 144 or 15 8 ̊F internal temperature. Ultrasound cooking was faster (P<.05), had greater (P<.05) moisture retention and less (P<.05) cooking loss, and used less energy (P<.05). It also produced muscle samples that required less (P<.05) peak force to shear than those from Conv cooking and resulted in superior (P<.05) myofibrillar tenderness. No significant interactions occurred among cooking method, muscle, or endpoint temperature. As expected, longissimus (ribeye) muscles cooked faster (P< .05) and required less (P<.05) energy and were superior (P<.05) in instrumentally measured texture and sensory tenderness than pectoralis muscles. Cooking to 158EF caused greater (P<.05) moisture and cooking losses, required more (P<.05) time and energy, and degraded (P<.05) instrumental textural and sensor y characteristics. Ultrasound offers a new cooking mode that could increase cooking speed, improve energy efficiency and improve some textural characteristics, compared to conventional cooking.BeefUltrasound cookingEndpoint temperatureTendernessUltrasound versus convection cooking of beef longissimus and pectoralis musclesConference paper