Heinrich, Katie M.Jitnarin, NattineeSuminski, Richard R.Berkel, LaVerneHunter, Christine M.Alvarez, LisaBrundige, Antionette R.Peterson, Alan L.Foreyt, John P.Haddock, C. KeithPoston, Walker S. Carlos2012-11-272012-11-272012-11-27http://hdl.handle.net/2097/15069Objective: To evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). Methods: 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. Results: Most were obese (men=81%; women=98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men>25%; women>30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF>35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively; p<0.05. BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF%-obesity (Θ for all comparisons>0.75, p<0.001). Optimal cut-points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC=100cm and BMI=29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC=79cm and BMI=25.5 (NIH) or WC=83cm and BMI=26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. Conclusion: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population-level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.en-USPermission to archive granted by AMSUS, November 19, 2012.Military personnelObesityBody compositionBody fat percentageBody mass indexWaist circumferenceROC curvesArticle (author version)