Worker injuries involving the interaction of cattle, cattle handlers, and farm structures or equipment

dc.citation.epage12en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Agricultural Safety and Healthen_US
dc.citation.spage3en_US
dc.citation.volume21en_US
dc.contributor.ORCIDorcid.org/0000-0002-9150-169X
dc.contributor.authorFox, Shannon L.
dc.contributor.authorRicketts, Mitchell S.
dc.contributor.authorMinton, J. Ernest
dc.contributor.authoreidemintonen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidsrevesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-11T16:32:15Z
dc.date.available2015-02-11T16:32:15Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-11
dc.date.published2015en_US
dc.description.abstractCattle have been identified as leading sources of injuries to agricultural workers. The present study focused on worker injuries that involved the interaction of cattle, cattle handlers, and farm structures or equipment. The goal of the study was to identify opportunities for injury prevention. We examined 221 reports of injury to cattle handlers from the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). Expected interactions led to many of the cattle-handling injuries reported in the NEISS database. In almost 30% of cases, cattle pushed workers into structures such as fences, gates, posts, and walls. In another 16% to 19% of injuries, cattle struck gates and other objects, propelling them at the victims. The present research makes several important contributions to the study of cattle-handling injuries. First, the research supports an increased emphasis on the development of safer gate designs (e.g., gates that are remotely operated or that absorb energy to limit the speed at which they may be propelled by animals). Second, the research suggests a need for additional study of energy-absorbing fence and wall structures. We view these two points to be of significance because gates and associated structures (e.g., posts, fences, and walls) accounted for 45% of the injuries in the dataset, based on the associated injury narrative. Finally, the research identifies a previously unexplored source of agricultural injury data, namely the NEISS database.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18853
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural accidentsen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural injuriesen_US
dc.subjectCattleen_US
dc.subjectCattle handlingen_US
dc.subjectFarm accidentsen_US
dc.subjectFarm injuriesen_US
dc.subjectSafetyen_US
dc.titleWorker injuries involving the interaction of cattle, cattle handlers, and farm structures or equipmenten_US
dc.typeArticle (publisher version)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JASH10221.pdf
Size:
216.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: