Effects of location and crushing Ralgro implants on cattle performance (summary of three trials)

dc.citation.epage70en_US
dc.citation.spage68en_US
dc.contributor.authorCorah, L.R.
dc.contributor.authorPlegge, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, G.
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-18T17:57:54Z
dc.date.available2011-02-18T17:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-18
dc.date.published1980en_US
dc.description.abstractImplanting at an alternate location (in the muscle or fat pad at the base of the ear) or crushing the pellets did not appear to cause side effects or adversely affect animal performance. However, implanting at the alternate location significantly improved (6.6%) average daily gain in all three trials. Based on these and other studies, the recommended location for Ralgro implants is as close to the base of the ear as possible.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1980, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 7, 1980en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7391
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1980en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 377en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectImplantsen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectAverage daily gainen_US
dc.titleEffects of location and crushing Ralgro implants on cattle performance (summary of three trials)en_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle80pg68-70.pdf
Size:
158.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: