A comparison of design using strut-and-tie modeling and deep beam method for transfer girders in building structures

dc.contributor.authorSkibbe, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T15:21:36Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T15:21:36Z
dc.date.graduationmonthMayen_US
dc.date.issued2010-05-06T15:21:36Z
dc.date.published2010en_US
dc.description.abstractStrut-and-Tie models are useful in designing reinforced concrete structures with discontinuity regions where linear stress distribution is not valid. Deep beams are typically short girders with a large point load or multiple point loads. These point loads, in conjunction with the depth and length of the members, contribute to a member with primarily discontinuity regions. ACI 318-08 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete provides a method for designing deep beams using either Strut-and-Tie models (STM) or Deep Beam Method (DBM). This report compares dimension requirements, concrete quantities, steel quantities, and constructability of the two methods through the design of three different deep beams. The three designs consider the same single span deep beam with varying height and loading patterns. The first design is a single span deep beam with a large point load at the center girder. The second design is the deep beam with the same large point load at a quarter point of the girder. The last design is the deep beam with half the load at the midpoint and the other half at the quarter point. These three designs allow consideration of different shear and STM model geometry and design considerations. Comparing the two different designs shows the shear or cracking control reinforcement reduces by an average 13% because the STM considers the extra shear capacity through arching action. The tension steel used for either flexure or the tension tie increases by an average of 16% from deep beam in STM design. This is due to STM taking shear force through tension in the tension reinforcement through arching action. The main advantage of the STM is the ability to decreased member depth without decreasing shear reinforcement spacing. If the member depth is not a concern in the design, the preferred method is DBM unless the designer is familiar with STMs due to the similarity of deep beam and regular beam design theory.en_US
dc.description.advisorKimberly W. Krameren_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Architectural Engineering and Construction Scienceen_US
dc.description.levelMastersen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/3907
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKansas State Universityen
dc.subjectStrut-and-Tie Modelingen_US
dc.subjectDeep Beamen_US
dc.subject.umiEngineering, Civil (0543)en_US
dc.titleA comparison of design using strut-and-tie modeling and deep beam method for transfer girders in building structuresen_US
dc.typeReporten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EricSkibbe2010.pdf
Size:
2.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.69 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: