Four ear tags evaluated

dc.citation.epage41en_US
dc.citation.spage40en_US
dc.contributor.authorSprott, L.R.
dc.contributor.authorCorah, L.R.
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-08T16:49:21Z
dc.date.available2011-02-08T16:49:21Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-08
dc.date.published1981en_US
dc.description.abstractFour types of ear tags were evaluated for retention over 2 years. Retention was low for one type, and high for the other three types.en_US
dc.description.conferenceCattlemen's Day, 1981, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, March 6, 1981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/7150
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Stationen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCattlemen’s Day, 1981en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station); 394en_US
dc.subjectBeefen_US
dc.subjectEar tagsen_US
dc.titleFour ear tags evaluateden_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cattle81pg40-41.pdf
Size:
143.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: