Evaluation of Ractopamine HCl feeding programs on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing pigs

dc.citation.epage271en_US
dc.citation.spage266en_US
dc.contributor.authorYing, W.
dc.contributor.authorDeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authorNelssen, Jim L.
dc.contributor.authorDritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.authoreidjderouchen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokachen_US
dc.contributor.authoreiddritzen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodbanden_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjnelssenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-16T19:46:14Z
dc.date.available2012-02-16T19:46:14Z
dc.date.issued2012-02-16
dc.date.published2011en_US
dc.description.abstractA total of 934 barrows and gilts (PIC 337 × 1050, initially 240 lb) were used in a 26-d experiment to evaluate the effect of different Ractopamine HCl (RAC) feeding programs on growth and carcass traits of finishing pigs. Treatments included a basal diet with (1) no RAC for 26 d (control), (2) 7.5 ppm RAC for 26 d (constant), (3) 5 ppm RAC for d 0 to 14 and 10 ppm for d 14 to 26 (step-up), and (4) RAC concentration increased daily from 5 ppm on d 0 to 10 ppm on 26 d by using the FEEDPro (Feedlogic Corp., Willmar, MN) system (curve). Each treatment had 10 pens with a similar number of barrows and gilts in each pen. From d 0 to 14, pigs fed diets containing RAC had greater (P < 0.001) ADG and better (P < 0.001) F/G than those fed the control diet. Pigs fed the constant or step-up RAC feeding methods had greater (P < 0.04) ADFI compared with those fed the control diet. From d 14 to 26, all RACfed pigs had greater (P < 0.001) ADG and better (P < 0.001) F/G than control pigs. Overall, pigs fed diets containing RAC had improved (P < 0.001) ADG and better F/G than pigs fed the control diet. Pigs fed the step-up RAC program had greater (P = 0.01) ADG and better (P = 0.02) F/G than the constant RAC program. Pigs marketed on d 14 and 26 had heavier (P < 0.001) HCW when fed diets containing RAC compared with control pigs. Pigs fed constant RAC had greater (P = 0.002) carcass yield than control pigs. Pigs fed the constant RAC program also had greater (P = 0.03) loin depth on d 14 than control pigs. No differences were found in carcass traits among RAC treatments. Feeding RAC improved performance regardless of feeding method, but few differences were present among the RAC feeding programs in carcass weights or measurements.en_US
dc.description.conferenceSwine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 17, 2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/13500
dc.publisherKansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Serviceen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfSwine Day, 2011en_US
dc.relation.isPartOfKansas Agricultural Experiment Station contribution; no. 12-064-Sen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfReport of progress (Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service); 1056en_US
dc.subjectSwineen_US
dc.subjectFeeding programen_US
dc.subjectFinishing pigen_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectRactopamine HClen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Ractopamine HCl feeding programs on growth performance and carcass characteristics of finishing pigsen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Swine11pg266-271.pdf
Size:
108.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections