Factors affecting farmers’ willingness to grow alternative biomass feedstocks for biofuels across Kansas

dc.citation.doi10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.009en_US
dc.citation.epage231en_US
dc.citation.jtitleBiomass and Bioenergyen_US
dc.citation.spage223en_US
dc.citation.volume66en_US
dc.contributor.authorCaldas, Marcellus M.
dc.contributor.authorBergtold, Jason S.
dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Jeffrey M.
dc.contributor.authorGraves, Russell W.
dc.contributor.authorEarnhart, Dietrich
dc.contributor.authorGong, Sheng
dc.contributor.authorLauer, Brian
dc.contributor.authorBrown, J. Christopher
dc.contributor.authoreidcaldasmaen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidbergtolden_US
dc.contributor.authoreidjpetersen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-21T18:50:55Z
dc.date.available2014-10-21T18:50:55Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01
dc.date.published2014en_US
dc.description.abstractEnergy conservation has emerged as one of the biggest challenges of the world in the XXI century, and not different from many countries, the US has created plans and policies to stimulate renewable energy alternative. Among the important alternatives for energy conservation is the use of biomass energy. Despite these stimuli production predictions are not confident that production would achieve the planned target for the U.S. Consequently, the predictions raise questions about farmer's willingness to grow bioenergy crops or produce alternative cellulosic feedstocks. In other words, farmers and landholders may not be willing to grow bioenergy crops. With this concerns in mind, the study advances previous research about bioenergy production by evaluating farmer's and landholder's willingness to produce different varieties of biofuel feedstocks. To achieve our goals, we used a mail survey of Kansas farmers conducted from January to April of 2011. The survey contained questions related to how farmers make their land-use decisions covering a wide array of topics. Through this survey, we evaluate the effect of farm characteristics, farm management practices, farmer perceptions (such as risk aversion), physical variables (such as soil, weather, and the availability of water for irrigation) on farmers' willingness to produce value-added feedstocks (e.g., corn stover), dedicated annual bioenergy crops (e.g., energy sorghum), and dedicated perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., switchgrass) for biofuel production in Kansas, though the use of logistic regressions and marginal effects.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/18394
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.04.009en_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectFeedstocksen_US
dc.subjectBiofuelen_US
dc.subjectFarmer's willingnessen_US
dc.subjectKansasen_US
dc.subjectCrop choiceen_US
dc.subjectScenariosen_US
dc.titleFactors affecting farmers’ willingness to grow alternative biomass feedstocks for biofuels across Kansasen_US
dc.title.alternativeFactors affecting farmers’ willingness to grow alternative biofuel feedstocks across Kansasen_US
dc.typeArticle (author version)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CaldasBiomassBioenergy2014.pdf
Size:
163.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: