Observation of public health risk behaviors, risk communication and hand hygiene at Kansas and Missouri petting zoos – 2010-2011

dc.citation.doi10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01531.xen_US
dc.citation.epage310en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.jtitleZoonoses and Public Healthen_US
dc.citation.spage304en_US
dc.citation.volume60en_US
dc.contributor.authorErdozain, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorKuKanich, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorPowell, Douglas A.
dc.contributor.authoreiddpowellen_US
dc.contributor.authoreidkstenskeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-04T19:50:50Z
dc.date.available2013-06-04T19:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-30
dc.date.published2013en_US
dc.description.abstractOutbreaks of human illness have been linked to visiting settings with animal contact throughout developed countries. This paper details an observational study of hand hygiene tool availability and recommendations; frequency of risky behavior; and, handwashing attempts by visitors in Kansas (9) and Missouri (4), U.S., petting zoos. Handwashing signs and hand hygiene stations were available at the exit of animal-contact areas in 10/13 and 8/13 petting zoos respectively. Risky behaviors were observed being performed at all petting zoos by at least one visitor. Frequently observed behaviors were: children (10/13 petting zoos) and adults (9/13 petting zoos) touching hands to face within animal-contact areas; animals licking children’s and adults’ hands (7/13 and 4/13 petting zoos, respectively); and children and adults drinking within animal-contact areas (5/13 petting zoos each). Of 574 visitors observed for hand hygiene when exiting animal-contact areas, 37% (n=214) of individuals attempted some type of hand hygiene, with male adults, female adults, and children attempting at similar rates (32%, 40%, and 37% respectively). Visitors were 4.8x more likely to wash their hands when a staff member was present within or at the exit to the animal-contact area (136/231, 59%) than when no staff member was present (78/343, 23%; p<0.001, OR=4.863, 95% C.I.=3.380-6.998). Visitors at zoos with a fence as a partial barrier to human-animal contact were 2.3x more likely to wash their hands (188/460, 40.9%) than visitors allowed to enter the animals’ yard for contact (26/114, 22.8%; p<0.001, OR=2.339, 95% CI=1.454-3.763). Inconsistencies existed in tool availability, signage, and supervision of animal-contact. Risk communication was poor, with few petting zoos outlining risks associated with animal-contact, or providing recommendations for precautions to be taken to reduce these risks.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/15881
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01531.xen_US
dc.rightsThis is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Erdozain, G., KuKanich, K., Chapman, B., & Powell, D. (2013). Observation of public health risk behaviors, risk communication and hand hygiene at Kansas and Missouri petting zoos – 2010-2011. Zoonoses and Public Health, 60(4), 304-310, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01531.x/fullen_US
dc.subjectPetting zooen_US
dc.subjectZoonotic transmissionen_US
dc.subjectHandwashing practicesen_US
dc.subjectRisk behavioren_US
dc.subjectAnimal contacten_US
dc.titleObservation of public health risk behaviors, risk communication and hand hygiene at Kansas and Missouri petting zoos – 2010-2011en_US
dc.typeArticle (author version)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PowellZoonosesPubHealth2013.pdf
Size:
141.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: