Effects of stocking density on finishing pig growth performance

dc.citation.doi10.2527/msasas2016-115
dc.citation.epage54
dc.citation.issn0021-8812
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Animal Science
dc.citation.spage54
dc.citation.volume94
dc.contributor.authorThomas, L. L.
dc.contributor.authorGoodband, Robert D.
dc.contributor.authorTokach, Michael D.
dc.contributor.authorDeRouchey, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorWoodworth, Jason C.
dc.contributor.authorDritz, Steven S.
dc.contributor.authoreidgoodband
dc.contributor.authoreidmtokach
dc.contributor.authoreidjderouch
dc.contributor.authoreidjwoodworth
dc.contributor.authoreiddritz
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T17:40:41Z
dc.date.available2016-09-20T17:40:41Z
dc.date.published2016
dc.descriptionCitation: Thomas, L. L., Goodband, R. D., Tokach, M. D., DeRouchey, J. M., Woodworth, J. C., & Dritz, S. S. (2016). Effects of stocking density on finishing pig growth performance. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 54-54. doi:10.2527/msasas2016-115
dc.description.abstractA total of 405 pigs (PIC 327 × 1050) from 2 consecutive finishing groups (group 1 initially 66 ± 1.8 kg BW, group 2 initially 61 ± 2.5 kg BW) were used to examine the effects of stocking density on finishing pig growth performance. Pens of pigs were balanced by initial BW and randomly allotted to 1 of 3 treatments with either 7 or 8 replications per treatment (group 1 and 2, respectively). Pens were stocked with 9 pigs, and adjustable gates provided treatments that allowed for 0.84, 0.74, or 0.65 m2 per pig. All pigs were fed the same diets fed in 3 phases. Pigs were provided with 7.91 cm of feeder space per pig. In both studies, as stocking density decreased, ADG and ADFI increased (linear, P < 0.019), but there was no difference in G:F. As a result, final weight was 3.9 and 5.3 kg greater (linear, P ? 0.005) in groups 1 and 2, respectively, when comparing the lowest to the highest stocking density treatments. When comparing growth performance to a suggested required k-value of 0.0336, performance should have been affected above 122, 102, and 83 kg at 0.84, 0.74, and 0.65 m2 per pig. In group 1, performance should not have been affected until after 109.0 kg, 94.0 kg, and 80.3 kg for the 0.84, 0.74, and 0.65 m2 per pig treatments, respectively. However, in group 1 even after d 14 (less than 74.5 kg), negative effects of increased stocking density were observed on ADFI (linear, P < 0.08). In group 2, performance should not have been affected until after 118 kg, 87 kg, and 74 kg for the 0.84, 0.74, and 0.65 m2 per pig treatments. Similar to group 1, feed consumption and consequently ADG decreased linearly (P ? 0.033) as stocking density increased, before pigs reached the k-value that should have influenced performance. Overall, this study indicates that increasing stocking density resulted in poorer ADG driven by a reduction in ADFI and the accepted k-value of 0.0336 might underestimate the impact of increased stocking density.
dc.description.embargo2017-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2097/34106
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.2527/msasas2016-115
dc.rightsCopyright © 2016. American Society of Animal Science.
dc.rights.urihttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0021-8812/
dc.subjectFinishing Pig
dc.subjectSpace Allowance
dc.subjectStocking Density
dc.subjectAgriculture
dc.titleEffects of stocking density on finishing pig growth performance
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jas-94-supplement2-54.pdf
Size:
275.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: